Machine Learning Algorithm Accuracy Using Single- versus Multi-Institutional Image Data in the Classification of Prostate MRI Lesions

Abstract

(1) Background: Recent studies report high accuracies when using machine learning (ML) algorithms to classify prostate cancer lesions on publicly available datasets. However, it is unknown if these trained models generalize well to data from different institutions. (2) Methods: This was a retrospective study using multi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) data from our institution (63 mpMRI lesions) and the ProstateX-2 challenge, a publicly available annotated image set (112 mpMRI lesions). Residual Neural Network (ResNet) algorithms were trained to classify lesions as high-risk (hrPCA) or low-risk/benign. Models were trained on (a) ProstateX-2 data, (b) local institutional data, and (c) combined ProstateX-2 and local data. The models were then tested on (a) ProstateX-2, (b) local and (c) combined ProstateX-2 and local data. (3) Results: Models trained on either local or ProstateX-2 image data had high Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC)s (0.82–0.98) in the classification of hrPCA when tested on their own respective populations. AUCs decreased significantly (0.23–0.50, p < 0.01) when models were tested on image data from the other institution. Models trained on image data from both institutions re-achieved high AUCs (0.83–0.99). (4) Conclusions: Accurate prostate cancer classification models trained on single-institutional image data performed poorly when tested on outside-institutional image data. Heterogeneous multi-institutional training image data will likely be required to achieve broadly applicable mpMRI models.

Improved prostate cancer diagnosis using a modified ResNet50-based deep learning architecture

“…This method has achieved a classification accuracy of 92.38%, outperforming many existing methods. Provenzano et al [ 27 ] examine the accuracy of a machine learning algorithm in classifying prostate MRI lesions using single- and multi-institutional image data.…”