2018
DOI: 10.18046/syt.v16i46.3034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning algorithms for inter-cell interference coordination

Abstract: The current LTE and LTE-A deployments require larger efforts to achieve the radio resource management. This, due to the increase of users and the constantly growing demand of services. For this reason, the automatic optimization is a key point to avoid issues such as the inter-cell interference. This paper presents several proposals of machine-learning algorithms focused on this automatic optimization problem. The research works seek that the cellular systems achieve their self-optimization, a key concept with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They have been widely discussed in the literature for their ability to adapt to changing scenarios and reduce site planning. For instance, the authors of [ 47 ] present various ML algorithms and how they have been employed to coordinate co-channel interference.…”
Section: Proposed Solution: Background Implementation and Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They have been widely discussed in the literature for their ability to adapt to changing scenarios and reduce site planning. For instance, the authors of [ 47 ] present various ML algorithms and how they have been employed to coordinate co-channel interference.…”
Section: Proposed Solution: Background Implementation and Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among RL approaches, Q-Learning (QL) has been constantly discussed in the literature, especially because it does not require estimating the dynamics of the environment (it is model-free) [ 47 ].…”
Section: Proposed Solution: Background Implementation and Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%