2022
DOI: 10.1007/s13198-022-01720-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning algorithms for predicting smokeless tobacco status among women in Northeastern States, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the high accuracy value obtained with the RF algorithm, this value can be improved using different algorithms. This result supports the findings obtained from previous studies conducted by Singh et al (2022) On the other hand, there have been some limitations concerning attributes used in the analyses. Some important questions could not be included, such as parents' smoking status and the resident type of the respondents in the analyses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the high accuracy value obtained with the RF algorithm, this value can be improved using different algorithms. This result supports the findings obtained from previous studies conducted by Singh et al (2022) On the other hand, there have been some limitations concerning attributes used in the analyses. Some important questions could not be included, such as parents' smoking status and the resident type of the respondents in the analyses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…According to a study by Jitenkumar Singh, Jiran Meitei, Alee, Kriina, and Haobijam (2022), the RF algorithm was superior and performed much better in predicting the status of smokeless tobacco use in women from northeastern Indian states than the other ML algorithms. It is thought that the research will make an important contribution to the literature as one of the examples showing how machine learning algorithms can be applied in the classification of health-related events.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%