2021 International Conference on Information Technology (ICIT) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/icit52682.2021.9491677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine Learning Algorithms for The Classification of Cardiovascular Disease- A Comparative Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 14 shows the comparison of the existing research and the proposed classifier. Khan et al 21 used LSTM as a classifier and concluded the accuracy of 91.39%, Al-Naami et al 59 used ANFIS which managed to achieve 89% accuracy, Nogueira et al 55 used SVM, in which the accuracy is 82.33%, Li et al 57 used CNN with 86.90% accuracy. Sharma et al 56 have also done research using the same dataset that is used in this research.…”
Section: Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 14 shows the comparison of the existing research and the proposed classifier. Khan et al 21 used LSTM as a classifier and concluded the accuracy of 91.39%, Al-Naami et al 59 used ANFIS which managed to achieve 89% accuracy, Nogueira et al 55 used SVM, in which the accuracy is 82.33%, Li et al 57 used CNN with 86.90% accuracy. Sharma et al 56 have also done research using the same dataset that is used in this research.…”
Section: Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moving forward, in Ref. 55 , the authors have also used a challenge database named Physionet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge. The database provides the training set consists of both EGG and PCG signals.…”
Section: Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study [21] compared the five most powerful ML platforms for classifying CVD data using the heart disease Cleveland dataset, which contains 303 instances and 76 attributes from the UCI ML repository. The classifiers considered were SVM, KNN, LR, DT, and NB.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a 10-fold cross-validation method, the experimenters determined the estimation of their detection models’ objectivity. According to their findings, LR obtained 91 percent accuracy, and BFNN achieved 88 percent accuracy [ 43 ]. In [ 44 ], they examined the performance of computational intelligence systems for identifying cardiac disease.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%