Within the domain of password security classification, the pursuit of practical and dependable methodologies has prompted the examination of both biological and technological paradigms. The present study investigates the efficacy of Mouth Brooding Fish (MBF) as an innovative method in contrast to conventional Machine Learning (ML) approaches for classifying password security. The research approach entails a rigorous examination of the comparative analysis of MBF and ML algorithms, evaluating their effectiveness in password classification using many criteria, including accuracy, robustness, flexibility, and durability against adversarial assaults. The findings suggest that ML approaches have shown significant effectiveness in classifying passwords. However, using methodologies inspired by the minimum Bayes risk framework demonstrates a higher degree of resistance against typical cyber dangers. The intrinsic biological mechanisms of MBF, encompassing adaptive behaviors and inherent protection, play a role in enhancing the resilience and adaptability of the password security categorization system. The results offer significant insights that can inform the evolution of password security systems, integrating biological principles with technical progress to enhance safeguarding measures in digital environments. To emphasize the advantages of the suggested approach, several ML approaches are investigated, such as Support Vector Machines (SVM), AdaBoost, Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Gaussian Kernel (GK), and Random Forest (RF). The F-score, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity metrics for MBF exhibit noteworthy performance compared to the other selected models, with values of 100%.