2021
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.741667
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine Learning Algorithms to Distinguish Myocardial Perfusion SPECT Polar Maps

Abstract: Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) plays an important role in patients with suspected and documented coronary artery disease (CAD). Machine Learning (ML) algorithms have been developed for many medical applications with excellent performance. This study used ML algorithms to discern normal and abnormal gated Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) images. We analyzed one thousand and seven polar maps from a database of patients referred to a university hospital for clinically indicated MPI between J… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Souza Filho et al [ 38 ] explored the potential of developing different ML models like Adaptive Boosting (AB), Gradient Boosting (BG), Random Forest (RF), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) to find the ideal model for efficient differentiation between normal and abnormal cases of SPECT Polar Maps labelled by human readers. The stress and rest conditions included a total of 1007 Polar Maps.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Souza Filho et al [ 38 ] explored the potential of developing different ML models like Adaptive Boosting (AB), Gradient Boosting (BG), Random Forest (RF), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) to find the ideal model for efficient differentiation between normal and abnormal cases of SPECT Polar Maps labelled by human readers. The stress and rest conditions included a total of 1007 Polar Maps.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity and specificity of the 8 ML methods in the test set were inconsistent, showing different advantages. We used a 10-fold cross-validation approach for the training data (42)(43)(44)(45). Ten-fold cross-validation divides the training set into 10 subsamples; 1 single subsample is retained as the data to validate the model, and the other 9 samples are used for training.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The applied ANN outperformed with 0.92% AUC. Filho et al in [20] compared four ensemble ML algorithms, namely: adaptive boosting (AB), gradient boosting (GB), eXtreme gradient boosting (XGB), and RF for the classification of SPECT images into normal and abnormal. The proposed model was evaluated with the utilization of the cross-validation approach and achieved an AUC of 0.853%, accuracy of 0.938%, and sensitivity of 0.963%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%