2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-022-11283-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning and clinical neurophysiology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fifty patients were included: 32 good outcomes (22 male; median age [IQR]: 12 [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] years) and 18 poor outcomes (8 male; 11 [7-14] years). Table 1 describes the cohort's demographic and clinical information.…”
Section: Patient Cohortmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fifty patients were included: 32 good outcomes (22 male; median age [IQR]: 12 [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] years) and 18 poor outcomes (8 male; 11 [7-14] years). Table 1 describes the cohort's demographic and clinical information.…”
Section: Patient Cohortmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several interictal FC features have been proposed as epileptogenic indicators, but the literature lacks data-driven machine learning (ML) attempts to optimize their use for patient-specific EZ localization when combined with ESI. Although ML has been largely employed on routine scalp EEG to detect or lateralize seizures, [11][12][13] limited attempts have been made to localize the EZ via interictal EEG, especially using FC biomarkers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is why the need for original perspectives of analysis is becoming more pressing. In this regard, the emergence of innovative technologies, such as machine learning (ML), has proven to be a valuable alternative to traditional statistical analyses [1,2,3] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%