2012
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-396535-6.00004-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine Learning and Event-Based Software Testing: Classifiers for Identifying Infeasible GUI Event Sequences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The algorithm constructs an optimal hyperplane that correctly classifies data points by separating the points of categories as much as possible [ 79 ]. The closest values to the classification margin are known as support vectors while the goal is to maximize the margin between the hyperplane and the support vectors [ 80 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algorithm constructs an optimal hyperplane that correctly classifies data points by separating the points of categories as much as possible [ 79 ]. The closest values to the classification margin are known as support vectors while the goal is to maximize the margin between the hyperplane and the support vectors [ 80 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gove and Faytong [18] claimed that a model of the GUI may not completely represent the GUI, and therefore may allow infeasible test cases to be generated that violate constraints in the GUI. They used two di®erent machine learning techniques, namely support vector machines and grammar induction, to identify infeasible test cases.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, it is assumed that the value for biological stage is entered to the biologicalStage variable through the GUI input object comboBox[Biological Stage]. Biological stages are adolescence (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20) and adult GUI input contract of Age Application is given in Table 2 with the following assertions:…”
Section: Modeling Gui With Input Contractsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional DTI methods are time-consuming, costly, and make it difficult to obtain three-dimensional structures of compounds and proteins [ 6 , 7 , 8 ]. The technology of machine learning accelerates the development of drug–target interactions, especially in reducing the blindness of experiments [ 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%