2023
DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2023.3257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine Learning and Statistics in Clinical Research—Bridging the Gap

Mert Karabacak,
Konstantinos Margetis
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the quantity of obtainable data is limited, it may require multiple attempts with different ML classifiers to identify the optimal ML approach. Compared with traditional statistical models, ML methods can automatically capture the complex relationships in the data, which is more valuable for clinical research [ 30 ], especially in building clinical prediction models [ 31 ]. Six ML-augmented approaches (AdaBoost, Extra Trees, gradient boosting, MLP, SVM, and RF) were employed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the quantity of obtainable data is limited, it may require multiple attempts with different ML classifiers to identify the optimal ML approach. Compared with traditional statistical models, ML methods can automatically capture the complex relationships in the data, which is more valuable for clinical research [ 30 ], especially in building clinical prediction models [ 31 ]. Six ML-augmented approaches (AdaBoost, Extra Trees, gradient boosting, MLP, SVM, and RF) were employed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%