2007
DOI: 10.1002/jps.20985
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning approaches for predicting compounds that interact with therapeutic and ADMET related proteins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
(172 reference statements)
0
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In step 2, following the description by Shi, et al [8], a total of 98 molecular descriptors were calculated and SVM models were constructed in this study. VS performance in screening large chemical libraries is measured by several indicators [9], including yield (percentage of known positives predicted as virtual hits), hit-rate (percentage of virtual hits that are known positives), false-hit rate (percentage of virtual hits that are known negatives) and enrichment factor (magnitude of hit-rate improvement over random selection from chemical libraries). In this study, virtual hit and false-hit rate in searching large chemical libraries were evaluated by using 13.56M PubChem and 168K MDDR compounds [8].…”
Section: P Wang Et Al / Identification Of Dual Active Agents Targetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In step 2, following the description by Shi, et al [8], a total of 98 molecular descriptors were calculated and SVM models were constructed in this study. VS performance in screening large chemical libraries is measured by several indicators [9], including yield (percentage of known positives predicted as virtual hits), hit-rate (percentage of virtual hits that are known positives), false-hit rate (percentage of virtual hits that are known negatives) and enrichment factor (magnitude of hit-rate improvement over random selection from chemical libraries). In this study, virtual hit and false-hit rate in searching large chemical libraries were evaluated by using 13.56M PubChem and 168K MDDR compounds [8].…”
Section: P Wang Et Al / Identification Of Dual Active Agents Targetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods and issues, which have been thoroughly reviewed, fall into two categories: empirical, data-based approaches (Stouch et al, 2003;Beresford et al, 2004;Yamashita and Hashida, 2004;Li et al, 2007) and structure-based approaches (Ng et al, 2004;Li et al, 2007). Data-based approaches can be subdivided into linear and nonlinear methods, and each approach may involve clustering.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ADMET processes often involve interaction with the associated proteins [13]. For example, the cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzymes, such as CYP 3A4, 2D6, and 2C9, are responsible proteins for the metabolism of most drug molecules.…”
Section: Classification Of Cyp 3a4 Substrates and Non-substratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A grid search based on leave-one-out cross validation was used to determine the best parameter values (C=4, ν=0.95 and Îł=0.03125). The procedure of backward-elimination was applied to produce the final SVR model with 13 …”
Section: Svr Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%