2022
DOI: 10.1109/access.2022.3218622
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine Learning Approaches for Radio Propagation Modeling in Urban Vehicular Channels

Abstract: The use of vehicular communications is anticipated to improve safety in road traffic. The traditional radio channel models that describe the effects of radio wave propagation in dynamic vehicular environments have their own limitations. In this paper, machine learning techniques are applied for radio channel modeling in urban vehicular environments. A large data set of path loss and RMS delay spread is computed using raytracing for a Line-of-Sight (LOS) straight road and a Non Line-of-Sight (NLOS) intersection… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [81], among the four machine learning models that were examined for their suitability in path loss prediction at 2.1 GHz, the RF model outperformed the rest of the models with minimum RMSE, MAE, and MAPE values of 4.662 dB, 3.19 dB, and 2.96%, respectively. Similarly, in [88], the RF model outperformed the two other models such as the CNN and MLP at 5.9 GHz, having the minimum RMSE and MAE values of 1.44 dB and 2.19 dB, respectively, followed by the CNN model with an RMSE value of 2.03 dB, as shown in Figure 6. Also, the RF model outperformed the KNN model at 3.5 GHz in [95], with a minimum RMSE value of 3.42 dB.…”
Section: Assessment Of Machine Learning Path Loss Models In Outdoor U...mentioning
confidence: 77%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In [81], among the four machine learning models that were examined for their suitability in path loss prediction at 2.1 GHz, the RF model outperformed the rest of the models with minimum RMSE, MAE, and MAPE values of 4.662 dB, 3.19 dB, and 2.96%, respectively. Similarly, in [88], the RF model outperformed the two other models such as the CNN and MLP at 5.9 GHz, having the minimum RMSE and MAE values of 1.44 dB and 2.19 dB, respectively, followed by the CNN model with an RMSE value of 2.03 dB, as shown in Figure 6. Also, the RF model outperformed the KNN model at 3.5 GHz in [95], with a minimum RMSE value of 3.42 dB.…”
Section: Assessment Of Machine Learning Path Loss Models In Outdoor U...mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Similar approaches in the deployment of machine learning models to predict path loss in the mid-band channel revealed that the random forest model performed excellently in [88,94,95] in an urban environment, while the neural-network-based models performed similarly in [81,84,86]. However, because every urban environment is made of unique layouts and streets, researchers should think about improving the models' performance in the propagation of mid-band 5G network deployment and future wireless communication networks in distinct scenarios of complex urban environments.…”
Section: Research Gapsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Additionally, vehicular communication is a key technology for intelligent transportation systems (ITS) due to the need for safer, more efficient, and sustainable transportation [10]. ITS applications consider the exchange of data in different vehicular communication among vehicles and with road infrastructure referred to as vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) [11,12], vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) [13,14,15], and vehicle-to-everything (V2X) [16] to provide secure and reliable wireless communications between vehicles to road infrastructure, and among vehicles, respectively, expected to operate in the frequency band below 6 GHz [17,18], and in millimeter wave [11], oriented to short-range communications [19].…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%