2020 14th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP) 2020
DOI: 10.23919/eucap48036.2020.9135936
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine Learning-assisted Antenna Design optimization: A Review and the State-of-the-art

Abstract: The material cannot be used for any other purpose without further permission of the publisher and is for private use only. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher's version if you wish to cite from it.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, we pre-defined the constraints as a high-pass behavior, with a cut-off frequency at 7.5 GHz, an insert loss of less than 4 dB, and a roll-off rate of 15 dB/GHz, as expressed in (26):…”
Section: High-passmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, we pre-defined the constraints as a high-pass behavior, with a cut-off frequency at 7.5 GHz, an insert loss of less than 4 dB, and a roll-off rate of 15 dB/GHz, as expressed in (26):…”
Section: High-passmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning-based methods are popular due to their unique merits compared to optimization algorithmbased methods, such as genetic algorithm-based methods (GA) [23]- [25]. A number of full-wave simulations are inevitable for optimization methods [26]. By contrast, machine learningbased methods accumulate intelligence from historical data to form a surrogate model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, full wave (FW) EM simulation, such as finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) or finite-element modeling (FEM) methods, is used for antenna design and optimization. These methods require large computational resources and time [36]. In fact, optimizing antenna arrays may involve significant repetitions of EM simulations to fine-tune the geometric and/or material parameters for performance improvement.…”
Section: Design Optimization and Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, global optimization methods seem to attract more interest because they are robust and require no significant modifications during their design or implementation. However, they usually necessitate a significant number of electromagnetic simulations, which can be costly, to obtain optimal design parameters [ 35 ]. A particularly efficient alternative to conventional methods for resolving these issues is metaheuristic optimization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%