2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2020.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine-learning assisted laser powder bed fusion process optimization for AlSi10Mg: New microstructure description indices and fracture mechanisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth noting that machine learning-based process optimization approaches have also been reported in recent years [60][61][62]. However, since different MPEAs have distinct physical and chemical characteristics and, thus, different responses to laser and electron beam, carefully designed experiments, physics-based computational modeling, and data-driving machine learning approaches should be combined and wisely integrated to obtain the optimized PBF process window for specific MPEAs [63].…”
Section: Powder Bed Fusion (Pbf)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is worth noting that machine learning-based process optimization approaches have also been reported in recent years [60][61][62]. However, since different MPEAs have distinct physical and chemical characteristics and, thus, different responses to laser and electron beam, carefully designed experiments, physics-based computational modeling, and data-driving machine learning approaches should be combined and wisely integrated to obtain the optimized PBF process window for specific MPEAs [63].…”
Section: Powder Bed Fusion (Pbf)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, it can enable the exploration of new MPEAs and the characterization of their solid solution structure and the evaluation of their AM processability by analyzing their physical and chemical properties [178][179][180]. Secondly, large optimal processing windows for AM of MPEAs can be established by machine learning methods which will allow the tailoring of their microstructures and properties, which has been recently demonstrated for conventional alloys [62,63]. Thirdly, exploring the relationships between the alloy composition, processing, microstructure, and properties for AM MPEAs would generally require a huge number of experiments, which poses a significant challenge in terms of needed time and resources.…”
Section: Machine Learning For Am Of Mpeasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, we briefly summarize related work on machine learning methods (e.g., neural networks, Support Vector Machines, k-means clustering, random forests, generative networks, and more) applied to several diverse challenges in molecular and materials science fields. In particular, active research areas for ML in materials science include (but are not limited to): accelerated materials design and property prediction [40][41][42][43][44][45][46], process optimization [47,48], discovery of structure-property relationships [49,50], construction of potential energy surfaces for molecular dynamics simulations [51][52][53], prediction of atomic scale properties [54], text mining for knowledge extraction [55], microstructure and materials characterization [10,11,25,30,[56][57][58], and generation of synthetic microstructure images [31]. Such applications span multiple length scales and a variety of material systems (metals and alloys, oxides, polymers) [59].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, AM technology has been expected as an ideal method to fabricate parts with sophisticated shape [6][7][8][9]. With the rapid development of AM technology, more and more methods have sprung up, such as Selective Laser Sintering (SLS), Selective Laser Melting (SLM), Three-dimensional Printing (3DP), Direct Ink Writing (DIW), Digital Light Processing (DLP) and so on [10][11][12]. SLM and SLS are always used to produce metal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SLM and SLS are always used to produce metal. Owing to the high melting temperature of ceramic, and the inherent high thermal gradient and residual thermal stress of the laser-based AM technologies, SLM and SLS are unsuitable for ceramic [11,13]. 3DP and DIW are the most widely applicable AM technologies, and it can be used in all material system, including metal, ceramic and polymer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%