2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2021.112626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning-assited optical thermometer for continuous temperature analysis inside molten metal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature specifically on NN temperature analysis is very limited and is either applied in one-or two-dimensions. One-dimensional studies include atmospheric temperature profiles as functions of altitude (a feedforward neural network, FFNN, with a root mean squared error (RMSE) between ±0.4-1 K [26] and ±1.61 K [27]), temperature and concentration profiles of gases during a combustion reaction (multilayer perceptron (MLP) network with an RMSE between 1.2-8.1% [28]), and a 1D convolutional neural network (CNN) for optical IR thermometer in molten metals [29]. For two-dimensional studies, hyperspectral imaging (RMSE of ±1.14 K [30]), time-of-flight for ultrasonic waves (a mean error near ±0.12 K [31]), 2D flame surface and temperature by CNN [32] (with an unreported RMSE), and flame spectral absorption images (RMSE of ±13.5K [33]) were used to determine temperature.…”
Section: Neural Network Approaches To Temperature Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature specifically on NN temperature analysis is very limited and is either applied in one-or two-dimensions. One-dimensional studies include atmospheric temperature profiles as functions of altitude (a feedforward neural network, FFNN, with a root mean squared error (RMSE) between ±0.4-1 K [26] and ±1.61 K [27]), temperature and concentration profiles of gases during a combustion reaction (multilayer perceptron (MLP) network with an RMSE between 1.2-8.1% [28]), and a 1D convolutional neural network (CNN) for optical IR thermometer in molten metals [29]. For two-dimensional studies, hyperspectral imaging (RMSE of ±1.14 K [30]), time-of-flight for ultrasonic waves (a mean error near ±0.12 K [31]), 2D flame surface and temperature by CNN [32] (with an unreported RMSE), and flame spectral absorption images (RMSE of ±13.5K [33]) were used to determine temperature.…”
Section: Neural Network Approaches To Temperature Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temperature is a crucial physical parameter in numerous industrial operations and scientific research. Because of their accuracy, sensitivity, and applicability to complex environments, non-contact fluorescence thermometers have attracted considerable research interest in recent years and are used for temperature measurements in medicine, chemistry, and other industries [ 1 , 2 ]. Two main temperature measurement strategies are generally practiced: one is temperature measurement using a pair of thermally coupled levels (TCL), where the relative sensitivity (S r ) is directly proportional to the energy gap of the relevant TCLs [ 3 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This hypothesis is based on planar temperature reconstruction from a series of images taken using thermochromic liquid crystals (TLC), where a pixel-topixel based simply connected feedforward network (P2P-SCFFNN) achieved a mean absolute deviation near ±0.1 K over a 4.4 K range from 291.1 to 295.5 K [14]. NNs have been used to recreate temperature from other signals as well, such as IR thermometry of a point [15], atmospheric temperature at varying altitudes [16], flame temperature and composition [17][18][19], and time-of-flight for ultrasonic waves [20]. Previous works' fundamental limitations are that they cannot create a 2D image or have not been applied to fluorescence thermometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%