2022
DOI: 10.1002/stc.3028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning‐based automatic operational modal analysis: A structural health monitoring application to masonry arch bridges

Abstract: Structural health monitoring (SHM) is one of the main research topics in civil, mechanical and aerospace engineering. In this regard, modal parameters and their trends over time can be used as features and indicators of damage occurrence and growth. However, for practical reasons, output-only techniques are particularly suitable for the system identification (SI) of large civil structures and infrastructures, as they do not require a controlled source of input force.In this context, these approaches are typica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results show that this method can match other mature SI technologies well, such as the Eigensystem Realization Algorithm (ERA), and can be used for damage assessment. On this basis, they combined machine learning and operational modal analysis to propose a novel automatic OMA multi-stage clustering algorithm and applied it to the damage detection and damage degree assessment of masonry arch bridges [150]. Conde et al [151] obtained the most probable distribution of the finite element model parameters by using a Bayesian method and the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method based on the comparison between the finite element calculation results and the actual measured geometric data so as to reproduce the existing damage mode with the highest accuracy using the numerical model.…”
Section: Masonry Arch Bridge Damage Identification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results show that this method can match other mature SI technologies well, such as the Eigensystem Realization Algorithm (ERA), and can be used for damage assessment. On this basis, they combined machine learning and operational modal analysis to propose a novel automatic OMA multi-stage clustering algorithm and applied it to the damage detection and damage degree assessment of masonry arch bridges [150]. Conde et al [151] obtained the most probable distribution of the finite element model parameters by using a Bayesian method and the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method based on the comparison between the finite element calculation results and the actual measured geometric data so as to reproduce the existing damage mode with the highest accuracy using the numerical model.…”
Section: Masonry Arch Bridge Damage Identification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the face of the increasing number of arch bridge accidents, domestic and international scholars have carried out many useful scientifc studies [10]. Civera et al [11] tested and validated a novel multistage clustering algorithm for SHM applications of automatic OMA (AOMA), especially for damage detection and severity assessment of masonry arch bridges. Ge et al [12] presented an experimental validation for a high-precision vision-based displacement-infuenced line (DIL) measurement system for the purpose of damage detection on bridges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The monitoring approaches that are usually applied to masonry constructions are both vibration- and strain-based SHM methods; the monitoring of displacements is also widely adopted in common practice, especially to assess crack growth over time [ 11 , 12 ]. The potential applications of vibration-based SHM methods encompass the monitoring of slender structures, such as historic masonry towers [ 13 , 14 , 15 ] and buildings, such as palaces and churches [ 16 , 17 , 18 ], and bridges [ 19 , 20 , 21 ]. The practical applications of strain-based SHM methods to similar structural settings can be found in the literature [ 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%