2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning-based bridge cable damage detection under stochastic effects of corrosion and fire

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…185 The illustrations of SVM for linear and nonlinear classifications are presented in Figure 17(a) and (b) 185 respectively. SVM finds a wide range of applications, such as looseness detection in bolted joints, 129 prediction of mechanical properties of cement mortar, 186 damage detection in frames, 187 fault diagnosis in engines, 188 damage detection in bridges, 189 etc.…”
Section: Overview Of ML Methods For Bolt Looseness Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…185 The illustrations of SVM for linear and nonlinear classifications are presented in Figure 17(a) and (b) 185 respectively. SVM finds a wide range of applications, such as looseness detection in bolted joints, 129 prediction of mechanical properties of cement mortar, 186 damage detection in frames, 187 fault diagnosis in engines, 188 damage detection in bridges, 189 etc.…”
Section: Overview Of ML Methods For Bolt Looseness Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through assimilation and training with historical response data from numerous bridge structures, it is possible to develop predictive models. Methods such as Support Vector Machine (SVM) [16], Random Forests (RFs) [17], and neural networks [18] can be employed to predict the dynamic responses of bridge structures by learning the relationship between input features (such as wind speed, wind direction, and structural geometry) and output responses. In contrast to SVM and RF methods, neural networks excel in capturing intricate nonlinear connections, boasting adaptive learning capabilities that allow them to tailor predictions to diverse bridge structures and operating conditions [19,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past years, machine and deep learning have performed well predicting mechanical properties (Bagherzadeh et al, 2023; Shafighfard et al, 2022) and structural response (Hou et al, 2022). As for bridge real-time response prediction, several algorithms have been successful in predicting and assessing bridge responses, such as auto-regression and moving-average (ARMA) model (Fan et al, 2016; Wang et al, 2013), support machine regression (SVR) (Feng et al, 2022), recurrent neural networks (RNNs) (Zhang et al, nd), and others (Lu et al, 2021; Ren et al, 2022). Among them, RNNs can remarkably simulate the model’s time-dependence and non-linearity, significantly improving the ability to predict long-sequence responses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%