2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.103346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning-based coronary artery disease diagnosis: A comprehensive review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
94
0
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 185 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
1
94
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, there is no way to verify claims in any of the publications for the accuracy of the algorithms, as the computer code has not been made publicly available 1 . A PubMed search using the same keywords identified ten original articles and one comprehensive review article [9]. Of the ten original articles, three used the Cleveland dataset, whereas the remaining seven used proprietary datasets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, there is no way to verify claims in any of the publications for the accuracy of the algorithms, as the computer code has not been made publicly available 1 . A PubMed search using the same keywords identified ten original articles and one comprehensive review article [9]. Of the ten original articles, three used the Cleveland dataset, whereas the remaining seven used proprietary datasets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ten-fold cross-validation was used on the extracted data to evaluate the performance of the algorithms. We used the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of the algorithms for their performance comparison [54][55][56]. The accuracy of these algorithms is shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 4 shows the specificity of the different algorithms used in this research. Specificity is also called the true negative rate and estimates the proportion of actual negatives that are correctly recognized as such [54]. Again, the neural network has the best specificity rate, followed by rule induction, KNN (K = 22), KNN (K = 25), and LDA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as with all technological innovations, there are certain limitations which are yet to be addressed. Using ML in the field of diagnostic and treatment is always accompanied by the dataset limitation such that the decreased availability of features to be fed into the system can impact on ML performance, especially in disease diagnostics [21]. This is further reinforced by the vulnerability of the system given its dependence on the data used for training; hence, erroneous or biased data will result in flawed outputs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%