Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics 2020
DOI: 10.1364/cleo_qels.2020.fw3b.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine Learning-based Diffractive Imaging with Subwavelength Resolution

Abstract: Far-field characterization of small objects is severely constrained by the diffraction limit. Existing tools achieving sub-diffraction resolution often utilize point-by-point image reconstruction via scanning or labelling. Here, we present a new imaging technique capable of fast and accurate characterization of two-dimensional structures with at least /25 resolution, based on a single far-field intensity measurement. Experimentally, we realized this technique resolving the smallest-available to us 180nm-scale… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, we note that the concept of a library, and subsequent retrieval of parameters allows for other solutions than PCA-based techniques. Recently, several groups have addressed related challenges through machine learning, successfully retrieving parameters with subdiffractive precision as good as λ/25 for optical wavelength λ. , For such demonstrations, the number of distinguishable parameter values is typically orders of magnitude smaller than the size of the “training set”, that is, the size of the calibration library that is required. In an additional drawback, it is often difficult to interpret how the neural network performs its function and whether it is robust to minor changes in parameters, regularization being one of the oldest and toughest problems in machine learning.…”
Section: Parameter Retrieval Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we note that the concept of a library, and subsequent retrieval of parameters allows for other solutions than PCA-based techniques. Recently, several groups have addressed related challenges through machine learning, successfully retrieving parameters with subdiffractive precision as good as λ/25 for optical wavelength λ. , For such demonstrations, the number of distinguishable parameter values is typically orders of magnitude smaller than the size of the “training set”, that is, the size of the calibration library that is required. In an additional drawback, it is often difficult to interpret how the neural network performs its function and whether it is robust to minor changes in parameters, regularization being one of the oldest and toughest problems in machine learning.…”
Section: Parameter Retrieval Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%