2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevaccelbeams.21.112802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning-based longitudinal phase space prediction of particle accelerators

Abstract: We report on the application of machine learning (ML) methods for predicting the longitudinal phase space (LPS) distribution of particle accelerators. Our approach consists of training a ML-based virtual diagnostic to predict the LPS using only nondestructive linac and e-beam measurements as inputs. We validate this approach with a simulation study for the FACET-II linac and with an experimental demonstration conducted at LCLS. At LCLS, the e-beam LPS images are obtained with a transverse deflecting cavity and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
84
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
84
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The application of machine-learning methods for predicting the longitudinal phase space distribution at FACET-II has been studied and tested. The approach consists of training a machine-learning-based virtual diagnostic to predict the longitudinal phase space using only nondestructive linac and e-beam measurements as inputs [12]. This approach has been validated with a simulation study for the FACET-II linac and with an experimental demonstration conducted at LCLS-an important step towards showing the feasibility of implementing such a virtual diagnostic at FACET-II.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of machine-learning methods for predicting the longitudinal phase space distribution at FACET-II has been studied and tested. The approach consists of training a machine-learning-based virtual diagnostic to predict the longitudinal phase space using only nondestructive linac and e-beam measurements as inputs [12]. This approach has been validated with a simulation study for the FACET-II linac and with an experimental demonstration conducted at LCLS-an important step towards showing the feasibility of implementing such a virtual diagnostic at FACET-II.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine operators could use these models to check the potential impact of setting changes before trying them out on the actual machine, or to assess a new course of action as goals change during an operating shift. These models could also be used as a diagnostic tool to provide predictions about unmeasured beam parameters (i.e., as a virtual diagnostic [21,26,46]) or to flag when the system has changed substantially (i.e., model-based anomaly detection). They could also be exploited in model-based control and model-guided optimization routines (i.e., using the model to help guide the search for optimal settings, as is done in model predictive control and Bayesian optimization [47]).…”
Section: A Incorporation Into On-line Modeling and Model-based Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Powerful NN tools have also been developed for ML-based longitudinal phase space prediction of transverse deflecting cavity readings in particle accelerators, which are some of the most important diagnostics that exist for measuring a beam's longitudinal phase space [52,53]. A novel Bayesian optimization framework that uses sparse online Gaussian processes has been applied for quadrupole magnet tuning in an FEL [54].…”
Section: B Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%