2019
DOI: 10.1109/lawp.2018.2885570
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine-Learning-Based PML for the FDTD Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance of our LSTM model in the online application stage is demonstrated in Fig. 6, where the relative errors of LSTM PML model at Point A and B are compared both with the 5-cell and 1-cell conventional PML and with the previously proposed HTBF based PML [20]. As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Model Embeddingmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The performance of our LSTM model in the online application stage is demonstrated in Fig. 6, where the relative errors of LSTM PML model at Point A and B are compared both with the 5-cell and 1-cell conventional PML and with the previously proposed HTBF based PML [20]. As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Model Embeddingmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…3) NUMBER OF HIDDEN UNIT in most cases, the determination of the exact number of hidden unit for h t is still an important research area for deep learning [18]- [20], [39]- [40]. In this paper, as the most commonly used strategy for deep learning, the trialand-error process is taken to ensure the number of hidden unit [18]- [20]. While various number of hidden units can be tried, the expected values are the smaller ones resulting into smaller training errors and less computation.…”
Section: ) Activation Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations