2015
DOI: 10.1177/1932296815614866
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine-Learning-Based Prediction of a Missed Scheduled Clinical Appointment by Patients With Diabetes

Abstract: Our findings may provide information to help clinicians make timely interventions to avoid MAs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A fuzzy approach was also presented by Eghbali-Zarch et al to address the problem of medication selection in T2D patients [ 148 ]. Finally, Kurasawa et al proposed a machine learning algorithm to predict missed clinical appointments and help patients continue regular doctor visits [ 149 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A fuzzy approach was also presented by Eghbali-Zarch et al to address the problem of medication selection in T2D patients [ 148 ]. Finally, Kurasawa et al proposed a machine learning algorithm to predict missed clinical appointments and help patients continue regular doctor visits [ 149 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Longer gaps between appointments was a predictor for non‐attendance but there was no seasonal variation in attendance rates . A machine‐learning algorithm helped predict missed diabetes appointments at a Japanese hospital and found that ‘how and when’ an appointment was booked contributed more to attendance than the individual's clinical condition . Factors with the strongest predictive accuracy of a missed appointment included making appointments on a Sunday, scheduling appointments for a Friday, a history of diabetic ketoacidosis in those with type 2 diabetes and a recent prescription of Rilmazafone (a water‐soluble benzodiazepine).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They reported that the AUC increased slightly as more information became available, obtaining a maximum AUC of 0.706 in the 19th model. An article published that year by Kurasawa et al [ 30 ] deserves special attention. In this work, an LR with feature selection is conducted by means of an L2 regularization.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%