2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00521-020-05123-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning-based QOT prediction for self-driven optical networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ML methods can have more meaningful results for various research topics [3,[22][23][24]. The important thing is to determine the correct algorithms to obtain the relevant results for the problem [9,[25][26][27].…”
Section: Machine Learning Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ML methods can have more meaningful results for various research topics [3,[22][23][24]. The important thing is to determine the correct algorithms to obtain the relevant results for the problem [9,[25][26][27].…”
Section: Machine Learning Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, Machine Learning (ML) methods have been the most crucial research topic in nonlinear problems [1][2][3]. With ML algorithms, unlimited alternative solutions and options can be produced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Support-vector machine and probabilistic neural network (PNN) models are merely used for categorization. In contrast, multilayer perceptron, radial basis function, and generalized regression neural network (GRNN) models are utilized for both regression and classification [11]. The best-transmitted forecasting (categorization methodology) and optical signal-to-noise ratio assessment (regression strategy) precision are achieved by PNN (with an aggregate precision of 99.6 0.5 percent) and GRNN (with an R-squared value of 0.957) [11].…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RMSE and MAE are statistical metrics that distinguish between true and false, whereas R2 depicts the difference between the actual and estimated reaction variance and how well the projected response variance explains the genuine response variance. As a result, a measurement near one is required, showing that the estimated response closely reflects the real reaction and is accurate [11].…”
Section: Prediction Model Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%