2022
DOI: 10.1093/jmicro/dfac019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine-learning-based quality-level-estimation system for inspecting steel microstructures

Abstract: Quality control of special steel is accomplished through visual inspection of its microstructure based on microscopic images. This study proposes an “automatic-quality-level-estimation system” based on machine learning. Visual inspection of this type is sensory-based, so training data may include variations in judgments and training errors due to individual differences between inspectors, which makes it easy for a drop in generalization performance to occur due to overfitting. To deal with this issue, we here … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the loss value for the training data is generally smaller than the loss value for the validation data in general learning, the proposed method showed a significantly lower loss value for the validation data. This discrepancy can be attributed to dispersion of correct answer values caused by data expansion, suggesting the potential to further improve judgment accuracy by adjusting the distribution of variance of correct answer values [3].Overall, the experimental results confirmed the effectiveness of the proposed method, demonstrating an improvement in estimation accuracy and generalization performance compared to the comparative method [3].…”
Section: Machine-learning-based Quality-level-estimation System For I...mentioning
confidence: 56%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Although the loss value for the training data is generally smaller than the loss value for the validation data in general learning, the proposed method showed a significantly lower loss value for the validation data. This discrepancy can be attributed to dispersion of correct answer values caused by data expansion, suggesting the potential to further improve judgment accuracy by adjusting the distribution of variance of correct answer values [3].Overall, the experimental results confirmed the effectiveness of the proposed method, demonstrating an improvement in estimation accuracy and generalization performance compared to the comparative method [3].…”
Section: Machine-learning-based Quality-level-estimation System For I...mentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The experiment used a four-part crossvalidation approach with a training-validation-testing ratio of 6.0:1.5:2.5. A comparative method without data expansion was also evaluated for independent verification [3]. As can be seen at Figure 5.…”
Section: Machine-learning-based Quality-level-estimation System For I...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, it is prone to overfitting, which is a condition where the learning data are overfitted, generalization is not possible, and high accuracy cannot be achieved with unknown data. To suppress overfitting and achieve high accuracy, a large amount of training data is required, but in practice, it is not always easy to collect a large amount of training data [162][163][164][165][166][167][168][169][170][171][172][173][174][175][176][177][178]. Moreover, it takes a long time to input a large amount of training data into a large-scale DNN and execute the learning process.…”
Section: Amounts Of Data and Computational Powermentioning
confidence: 99%