2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-94144-8_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine Learning-Based Restart Policy for CDCL SAT Solvers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have implemented in Python the ILP model and in PySat [12] the SAT Encoding discussed in Section 3. We use Gurobi 9.1.1 as ILP solver and Maplesat [15] as SAT solver. The experiments are run on a Dell Workstation with a Intel Xeon W-2155 CPU with 10 physical cores at 3.3GHz and 32 GB of RAM.…”
Section: Computational Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have implemented in Python the ILP model and in PySat [12] the SAT Encoding discussed in Section 3. We use Gurobi 9.1.1 as ILP solver and Maplesat [15] as SAT solver. The experiments are run on a Dell Workstation with a Intel Xeon W-2155 CPU with 10 physical cores at 3.3GHz and 32 GB of RAM.…”
Section: Computational Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SAT-based solvers expected to perform better as the state of the art in SAT solving advances. In fact, in the course of writing the paper, a new SAT solver appeared, namely MapleCOMSPS (Liang, 2018;Liang, Oh, Mathew, Thomas, Li, & Ganesh, 2018), that according to the results in recent SAT competitions outperforms the Glucose SAT solver (Balyo et al, 2017), originally used in MDD-SAT. Indeed, the integration of this new solver resulted in an improvement of MDD-SAT in some cases.…”
Section: Reflecting Advances Of Recent Sat Solversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main techniques used in CDCL solvers include clause-based learning of conflicts, random restarts, heuristic variable selection, and effective constraintpropagation data structures (Gong and Zhou 2017). Examples of highly efficient complete SAT solvers include Min-iSat (Eén and Sörensson 2003), BerkMin (Goldberg and Novikov 2007), PicoSAT (Biere 2008), Lingeling (Biere 2010), Glusose (Audemard and Simon 2014) and MapleSAT (Liang 2018). Overall, CDCL-based SAT solvers constitute a huge success for SAT problems, and have been dominating in the research of SAT solving.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%