2023
DOI: 10.1007/s11709-022-0909-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning-based seismic assessment of framed structures with soil-structure interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By substituting Equation (36) in Equation ( 35), the α m ratio for the parabolic loading case is obtained as follows:…”
Section: Moment Contribution Ratio For Parabolic Static Loadmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By substituting Equation (36) in Equation ( 35), the α m ratio for the parabolic loading case is obtained as follows:…”
Section: Moment Contribution Ratio For Parabolic Static Loadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noureldin et al [36] introduced an expert system framework that used supervised machine learning to predict seismic performance in low-to mid-rise structures while considering soil-structure interaction. The framework, which was validated through non-linear time history analysis, incorporated a novel global seismic assessment ratio, resulting in more accurate outcomes compared to traditional methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Support Vector Machines (SVM), a class of supervised learning algorithms, have steadily emerged as pivotal tools within the seismic community, particularly in the realm of event classification [20]. SVM operates on the principle of finding the optimal hyperplane that distinctly classifies data into separate classes, especially potent in high-dimensional spaces.…”
Section: Svm In Seismic Event Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies focused on the application of DLMs to predict the dynamic response of systems (e.g., Feng et al., 2021; Stoffel et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2019). Previous studies generally focused on the deterministic prediction of responses (e.g., Ali et al., 2023; Noureldin et al., 2023; Payán et al., 2017). Moreover, predicting the uncertainty of responses is highly affected by the input feature variability, which means that the heteroscedastic assumption needs to be considered, not the homoscedastic one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%