2022
DOI: 10.1177/13524585221112605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning classification of multiple sclerosis in children using optical coherence tomography

Abstract: Background: In children, multiple sclerosis (MS) is the ultimate diagnosis in only 1/5 to 1/3 of cases after a first episode of central nervous system (CNS) demyelination. As the visual pathway is frequently affected in MS and other CNS demyelinating disorders (DDs), structural retinal imaging such as optical coherence tomography (OCT) can be used to differentiate MS. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the utility of machine learning (ML) based on OCT features to identify distinct structural retinal fe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the same database but using convolutional neural networks to implement data augmentation using generative adversarial networks and a classifier, a perfect classification was obtained (accuracy = 1.0) (López-Dorado et al, 2021). In a paediatric population (disease duration: 0.6 years) it yielded accuracy = 0.80 when classifying multiple sclerosis patients versus controls using a Random Forest classifier (Ciftci Kavaklioglu et al, 2022). Since the results reported to date depend on factors such as the patient cohort characteristics, the technology used to take the readings (spectral domain OCT versus swept-source OCT), the exploratory protocol employed, the data analysis and classification method, as well as consideration of the subjects' other biological variables, etc., further studies are needed to determine the most appropriate procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the same database but using convolutional neural networks to implement data augmentation using generative adversarial networks and a classifier, a perfect classification was obtained (accuracy = 1.0) (López-Dorado et al, 2021). In a paediatric population (disease duration: 0.6 years) it yielded accuracy = 0.80 when classifying multiple sclerosis patients versus controls using a Random Forest classifier (Ciftci Kavaklioglu et al, 2022). Since the results reported to date depend on factors such as the patient cohort characteristics, the technology used to take the readings (spectral domain OCT versus swept-source OCT), the exploratory protocol employed, the data analysis and classification method, as well as consideration of the subjects' other biological variables, etc., further studies are needed to determine the most appropriate procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning (ML) techniques are capable of identifying complex relationships or patterns in empirical data and applying that knowledge to new datasets. Conventional neural networks, support vector machines and other traditional automatic classifiers can be used in MS diagnosis supported by OCT if the available information comprises peripapillary measurements or the average thickness values in the regions defined by the ETDRS grid (Cavaliere et al, 2019;Ciftci Kavaklioglu et al, 2022;Garcia-Martin et al, 2021;Kenney et al, 2022). When analysing a greater number of measurements, such as those produced by a 45 × 60 thicknesses matrix, it is preferable to use a convolutional neural network (CNN) (López-Dorado et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the limitations is that it was satisfied with only one model and did not compare it with modern models, and this is not sufficient to verify the results [29]. Ciftci worked on detecting multiple sclerosis through optical coherence tomography (OCT) features in children through machine learning algorithms, wherein the study was evaluated on a dataset of 512 eyes from 187 children, where the random forest model outperformed other models with a detection accuracy of 80% for MS and 75% for demyelinating diseases [30]. Kenny did so on separating optic neuritis and people with multiple sclerosis.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%