2022
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.2c19207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine Learning-Enabled Framework for High-Throughput Screening of MOFs: Application in Radon/Indoor Air Separation

Abstract: Radon and its progeny may cause severe health hazards, especially for people working in underground spaces. Therefore, in this study, a hybrid artificial intelligence machine learning-enabled framework is proposed for high-throughput screening of metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) as adsorbents for radon separation from indoor air. MOFs from a specific database were initially screened using a pore-limiting diameter filter. Subsequently, random forest classification and grand canonical Monte Carlo simulations were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that in the literature, many studies considered similar lists of features to those that are used in this study. , However, the feature list could involve different features such as atom density, energy histograms, atomic property weighted radial distribution functions (AP-RDFs), revised autocorrelation functions (RACs), etc., which are being increasingly used. Both the features involved and not involved in this study can be used not only for MOFs but also for other porous materials such as covalent–organic frameworks (COFs) and zeolites. It should be noted that, in contrast to this work, some of the studies in the literature involve ML models with more than two features to predict gas adsorption/separation performances. , In those ML models, many different features such as topology, void fraction, functional group density, most positive charge, most negative charge, metal angle, and surface atom density were utilized.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that in the literature, many studies considered similar lists of features to those that are used in this study. , However, the feature list could involve different features such as atom density, energy histograms, atomic property weighted radial distribution functions (AP-RDFs), revised autocorrelation functions (RACs), etc., which are being increasingly used. Both the features involved and not involved in this study can be used not only for MOFs but also for other porous materials such as covalent–organic frameworks (COFs) and zeolites. It should be noted that, in contrast to this work, some of the studies in the literature involve ML models with more than two features to predict gas adsorption/separation performances. , In those ML models, many different features such as topology, void fraction, functional group density, most positive charge, most negative charge, metal angle, and surface atom density were utilized.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, on the basis of a qualitative trend obtained as shown in Figure , we performed a proof-of-concept study that showcases only 2000 GCMC steps are sufficient for high-throughput screening; however, a greater number of GCMC steps should be used to validate the uptake capacity of that MOF. Indeed, there are previous studies in the literature that have used ∼3,000–10,000 steps to perform high-throughput screening of MOFs for gas adsorption. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%