2022
DOI: 10.1039/d2nr03696g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning enhanced in situ electron beam lithography of photonic nanostructures

Abstract: We report on the deterministic fabrication of quantum devices aided by machine-learning-based image processing. The goal of the work is to demonstrate that pattern recognition based on specifically trained machine...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the marker-based approaches require marker fabrication steps and extensive precharacterization, the in situ EBL technique enables simple preselection of QDs during a prior CL mapping step in an easy-one-coordinate system. In return, the dwell time per pixel during the mapping procedure is strongly constrained since the sample is already coated with a resist, a problem that can be mitigated by using in situ EBL with machine learning . Still, the flexibility in terms of illumination time during optical imaging provides an essential advantage for the marker-based methods, especially in the case of darker QDs (e.g., in the telecom O- and C-band), and additionally, the PL-based approach is more flexible in the choice of different excitation schemes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the marker-based approaches require marker fabrication steps and extensive precharacterization, the in situ EBL technique enables simple preselection of QDs during a prior CL mapping step in an easy-one-coordinate system. In return, the dwell time per pixel during the mapping procedure is strongly constrained since the sample is already coated with a resist, a problem that can be mitigated by using in situ EBL with machine learning . Still, the flexibility in terms of illumination time during optical imaging provides an essential advantage for the marker-based methods, especially in the case of darker QDs (e.g., in the telecom O- and C-band), and additionally, the PL-based approach is more flexible in the choice of different excitation schemes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An additional challenge lies in the requirement for the sample to be spin-coated with an EBL-resist during QD preselection via CL mapping. This introduces restrictions for the exposure time and the overall handling of the sample, an issue which, however, can be tackled by using machine learning enhanced in situ EBL . The so-achieved uncertainty for the QD position is 8.68 nm based on the same 2D Gaussian fit process described for the CL imaging.…”
Section: Qd Localization and Sample Structuring Via In Situ Electron ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To enable the controlled and scalable integration of single self-assembled QDs into photonic quantum devices, advanced nanofabrication technologies have been developed. For example, deterministic lithography techniques based on lowtemperature optical imaging 12 and cathodoluminescence (CL) spectroscopy 13 have been used to integrate single QDs into micropillars, 14 microlenses, 15 circular Bragg gratings, 16 and waveguide systems. 11 Here, we develop and use a marker-based scalable integration solution combining cryogenic CL spectroscopy and high-resolution electron beam lithography to deterministically embed two single InGaAs QDs into an IQPC based on GaAs/AlGaAs heterostructures.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%