2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-49656-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning for comprehensive forecasting of Alzheimer’s Disease progression

Abstract: Most approaches to machine learning from electronic health data can only predict a single endpoint. The ability to simultaneously simulate dozens of patient characteristics is a crucial step towards personalized medicine for Alzheimer’s Disease. Here, we use an unsupervised machine learning model called a Conditional Restricted Boltzmann Machine (CRBM) to simulate detailed patient trajectories. We use data comprising 18-month trajectories of 44 clinical variables from 1909 patients with Mild Cognitive Impairme… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
117
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
117
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent models of disease progression or aging either the mortality is not considered, 15 or the models require longitudinal data, 48,49 or both. [50][51][52] Structurally, our model differs from others by using an explicit network describing pairwise interactions, and it uses this network to generate stochastic changes to their health state as they age until death -rather than capturing the dynamics with unobserved latent variables that are harder to interpret. Using discrete health states within our model allows us to simply compare with observed health states using maximum likelihood methods, and enables our success using cross-sectional data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent models of disease progression or aging either the mortality is not considered, 15 or the models require longitudinal data, 48,49 or both. [50][51][52] Structurally, our model differs from others by using an explicit network describing pairwise interactions, and it uses this network to generate stochastic changes to their health state as they age until death -rather than capturing the dynamics with unobserved latent variables that are harder to interpret. Using discrete health states within our model allows us to simply compare with observed health states using maximum likelihood methods, and enables our success using cross-sectional data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ML likewise appears promising for precision medicine: given the patients' extreme heterogeneity of symptoms, medication response, and prognosis, the implementation of ML to create computational models of disease development tackles patients' diverseness (Fisher et al, 2019). Over the years, researchers have devised a number of disease progression models for both MCI and AD, relying on clinical and imaging data (Mueller et al, 2005;Ito et al, 2011;Rogers et al, 2012;Moradi et al, 2015;Miotto et al, 2017;Samper-Gonzalez et al, 2017;Fisher et al, 2019). Previous applications of ML to clinical data have proven useful in predicting a single outcome (e.g., the likelihood of conversion from MCI to AD) (Fisher et al, 2019).…”
Section: A New Integrated Approach To MCI Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This, in turn, leads to models biased toward specific disease stages (Ning et al, 2010). Various methods, such as complete data analysis (Xiang et al, 2013), imputation (Fisher et al, 2019), or analysis based on dichotomized data (Donohue et al, 2011), have been established to address censored data. Yet all of these methods may introduce error and impose complexities and biases on other integrative modeling steps, such as model interpretation, and thus need to be used with care (Prinja et al, 2010).…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%