2022
DOI: 10.1103/physrevmaterials.6.063804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning for metallurgy V: A neural-network potential for zirconium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lowest energy surface predicted by the DP model is surf-0001, consistent with the results of DFT and Ref. [51], and the DP model has high accuracy for surfaces (surf-10 11) and (surf- 11 22). The DP model shows that the surface energy is consistent with the DFT result, and can also predict the energy order of the surface of zirconium.…”
Section: Basic Physical Propertiessupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lowest energy surface predicted by the DP model is surf-0001, consistent with the results of DFT and Ref. [51], and the DP model has high accuracy for surfaces (surf-10 11) and (surf- 11 22). The DP model shows that the surface energy is consistent with the DFT result, and can also predict the energy order of the surface of zirconium.…”
Section: Basic Physical Propertiessupporting
confidence: 85%
“…For α-Zr, the lattice parameters (a and c), bulk modulus (B), elastic constants (C 11 , C 12 , C 13 , C 33, and C 44 ), and surface energy (surf-0001, surf-10 11, surf-11 22) are listed in Table 2. DFT NNP [51] EAM [50] a (HCP) 3.241 3.239 3.231 [57] 3.231 [58] 3.231 3.223 c/a 1.597 1.599 1.603 [57] 1.598 [58] 1.602 [59] 147.78 [58] 141.5 157.3 C 12 69.75 62.24 67.2 [59] 70.66 [58] 67.2 98.9 C 13 69.37 65.54 64.6 [59] 65.51 [58] 67.2 77.6 C 33 159.33 170.01 172.5 [59] 168.29 [58] 168.7 181.4 C 44 26.24 24.61 36.3 [59] 25.41 [58] 28.9 30.3 Surf-0001 1589.45 1638.12 2000 [60] 1580 [51] 1593.8 1127 Surf- 10 10 1657.40 1662.25 2050 [61] 1664 [51] 1631.9 1273 Surf- 11 22 1724.48 1718. 34 In general, the results from the DP model are in better agreement with the DFT results for these properties in comparison with those from EAM [50] and demonstrate that its performance is comparable to NNP's [51] in terms of DFT results.…”
Section: Basic Physical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[173][174][175][176] Machine learning based potentials (MLPs) have recently emerged as a promising method of accurately modelling the properties and dynamics of several systems and reactions. [177][178][179][180][181][182][183][184][185] As a result, MLPs are iteratively trained to 'learn' the potential energy surface of the system (based on limited DFT data) and can serve as a viable substitute for QM/MM and QM/QM schemes and apply to systems of arbitrary size at almost DFT level of accuracy. Consequently, MLPs can help to perform high-throughput screening of several catalyst configurations in multiple zeolites 179 if desired, in addition to being able to model system dynamics.…”
Section: Frontier Dalton Transactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zong et al adopted a kernel ridge regression model to capture the martensitic phase transformations in Zr, but this resulted in a low melting point . Nitol et al modeled the transformations among α, β, and ω phases of Zr and Ti using artificial neural networks as regression models, and Liyanage et al developed an artificial neural network potential for hcp Zr that focused on extended defect properties. These sophisticated neural network architectures can possess up to tens of thousands of parameters, fitted on over ten thousand DFT configurations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%