2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.126782
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning for the selection of carbon-based materials for tetracycline and sulfamethoxazole adsorption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
49
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Random Forest model was performed using the five selected variables and the importance of the variables is presented in Table 6 . According to this table, the adsorption efficiency is highly affected by initial concentration (0.347), surface area (0.287), and pore volume (0.131), which is in line with previous findings [ 46 , 47 ]. The initial dye concentration has the highest effect on the adsorption capacity [ 47 , 48 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Random Forest model was performed using the five selected variables and the importance of the variables is presented in Table 6 . According to this table, the adsorption efficiency is highly affected by initial concentration (0.347), surface area (0.287), and pore volume (0.131), which is in line with previous findings [ 46 , 47 ]. The initial dye concentration has the highest effect on the adsorption capacity [ 47 , 48 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…According to this table, the adsorption efficiency is highly affected by initial concentration (0.347), surface area (0.287), and pore volume (0.131), which is in line with previous findings [ 46 , 47 ]. The initial dye concentration has the highest effect on the adsorption capacity [ 47 , 48 ]. The increase of dye concentration gradients between the aqueous solution and adsorbent surface facilitated the adsorption of dye onto the agro-waste.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Different methods for remove antibiotics have been assessed, such as adsorption (Zhu et al 2021), enhanced activated sludge method(Chen et al 2020b), hydrolysis (Mitchell et al 2014), membrane ltration (Yin et al 2021),photocatalysis, photoelectrocatalysis(PEC) and advanced oxidation process(AOPs) (Yang and Wang 2021). Recently, the PEC process has been considered as a novel way to degrade antibiotics that combined with the advantage of photocatalytic (PC) and electrochemistry (EC).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A literature survey shows that the removal of the TCs family from wastewater has been reported, utilizing a variety of approaches, e.g., adsorption, photocatalysis, microbial degradation, membrane filtration, electrocatalytic oxidation, etc. [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ]. Yet, most of these reports, if not all, to the best of our knowledge, were focused on the elder members of the family with almost no effort being made for the removal of TIGC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnetization of the BC offers an extra advantage where the existence of magnetic nanoparticles with their tiny particle size, high surface-area-to-volume ration, rapid removal kinetics, possible recovery, and most significantly magnetism help in developing a unique wastewater treatment system [ 39 , 40 , 41 ]. Several reports on the utilization of BC (pristine and magnetic “MBC”) in the removal of antibiotics could be found in literature [ 20 , 21 , 38 , 39 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%