2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2022.111976
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning framework for determination of elastic modulus without contact model fitting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, there is also the chance of the model overfitting to noise in the data. In common ML applications, the number of instances in a dataset usually goes from a few thousand to hundreds of thousands, and it is no different when applied to AFM frameworks [31,46]. Thus, to ensure a robust initial model without excessively compromising computational costs, an initial dataset consisting of 40,000 curves was created.…”
Section: Synthetic Nanoindentation Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, there is also the chance of the model overfitting to noise in the data. In common ML applications, the number of instances in a dataset usually goes from a few thousand to hundreds of thousands, and it is no different when applied to AFM frameworks [31,46]. Thus, to ensure a robust initial model without excessively compromising computational costs, an initial dataset consisting of 40,000 curves was created.…”
Section: Synthetic Nanoindentation Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A different study [30] has presented a quasi-recurrent neural network to identify the coupling of vibrating modes in dynamic AFM (intermittent contact between probe and sample). At last, ML regression models were used to predict the elastic modulus based on nanoindentation curves, without having to fit them with a contact model, in the work presented in [31], where the ML models were trained with experimental F-I curves from AFM analyses. This last work shares some similarities with the current project, in the sense that they both focus on determining the sample's stiffness without contact model fitting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To address this problem, three different contact models were considered, distinguished by whether or not they allow tip-surface adhesion and whether the tip is more spherical or spheroconical. 112 These were used to train the ML model by finding the most appropriate model for the curve and subsequently the associated elastic modulus. These fit values were associated with seven different characteristic (dimensionless) features of each force curve.…”
Section: Nanowires and Nanotubesmentioning
confidence: 99%