2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2019.05.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning in resting-state fMRI analysis

Abstract: Machine learning techniques have gained prominence for the analysis of resting-state functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (rs-fMRI) data. Here, we present an overview of various unsupervised and supervised machine learning applications to rs-fMRI. We present a methodical taxonomy of machine learning methods in resting-state fMRI. We identify three major divisions of unsupervised learning methods with regard to their applications to rs-fMRI, based on whether they discover principal modes of variation across sp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
121
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 184 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 167 publications
(254 reference statements)
0
121
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For each segment, fit a linear function using least squares to determine slope, 6 and intercept, 6 . Subtract best fitting linear trend and compute fluctuation from mean of resulting signal, 6 To avoid biases introduced by volumetric sex differences, 390 subjects (190 nonoverlapping male-female pairs) were selected such that each pair had a matched total grey matter volume (cortical and subcortical) with a percent difference less than or equal to 1%. The final volume-matched sample did not differ in total grey matter volume (p>0.05) between males and females.…”
Section: Hurst Exponentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For each segment, fit a linear function using least squares to determine slope, 6 and intercept, 6 . Subtract best fitting linear trend and compute fluctuation from mean of resulting signal, 6 To avoid biases introduced by volumetric sex differences, 390 subjects (190 nonoverlapping male-female pairs) were selected such that each pair had a matched total grey matter volume (cortical and subcortical) with a percent difference less than or equal to 1%. The final volume-matched sample did not differ in total grey matter volume (p>0.05) between males and females.…”
Section: Hurst Exponentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, machine learning techniques have increasingly been used in the analysis of resting-state fMRI data [6]. Supervised methods have been successfully applied to make subject-level predictions in both healthy and clinical populations [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More movies would not only increase generalisability, they would increase the number of stimulus features and events in a variety of (jittered) contexts that might be annotated. These could then be used to label finer grained patterns of activity, e.g., making machine learning/decoding approaches more feasible [55][56][57] .…”
Section: Natural-fmrimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of the research in this direction has aimed at identifying connectivity based biomarkers, restricting the analysis to so-called "static" functional connectivity measures that quantify the average degree of synchrony between brain regions. For e.g., machine learning based strategies have been used with static connectivity measures to parcellate the brain into functional networks, and extract individual-level predictions about cognitive state or clinical condition [2]. In recent years, there has been a surge in the study of the temporal dynamics of rs-fMRI data, offering a complementary perspective on the functional connectome and how it is altered in disease, development, and aging [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related Work: Machine learning methods are increasingly used to compute individual-level predictions from rs-fMRI data, e.g. about disease [2]. The conventional approach of supervised learning relies on labeled training data and uses hand-crafted features such as the static correlation between pairs of regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%