Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Virtual Reality 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3293663.3293673
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine Learning Methods for Septic Shock Prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
(241 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We consider the early prediction of septic shock using the MIMIC-III dataset, following the frameworks provided in recent data-driven works for data pre-processing [38,15,59,45,36]. Specifically, we use 14 commonly-utilized vital signs and lab results over a 2-hour observation window to predict whether a patient will develop septic shock in the next 4-hour window, which we refer to as the early prediction window (EPW) -details are provided in Appendix D.1.…”
Section: Mimic-iiimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider the early prediction of septic shock using the MIMIC-III dataset, following the frameworks provided in recent data-driven works for data pre-processing [38,15,59,45,36]. Specifically, we use 14 commonly-utilized vital signs and lab results over a 2-hour observation window to predict whether a patient will develop septic shock in the next 4-hour window, which we refer to as the early prediction window (EPW) -details are provided in Appendix D.1.…”
Section: Mimic-iiimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scoring tools such as the Early Warning Score (MEWS), shock index, and quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) or Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) are widely used in EDs (6)(7)(8). In addition, machine learning-based shock-prediction models are being studied (9)(10)(11)(12), and vital-sign information can be obtained in real time. A previous study reported the use of serial vital signs in predicting patient status in intensive care units (ICUs) or wards (13).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a combination of tree predictors such that each tree depends on the values of a random vector sampled independently and with the same distribution for all trees in the forest. Random forest (RF) has been used in biology and medicine, such as high-dimensional genetic or tissue microarray data and MIMIC-III [1][2][3][4][5][6]. It is specifically devised to operate quickly and efficiently over large datasets because of the simplification and it offers the highest prediction accuracy compared to other models in the setting of classification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%