2021
DOI: 10.1186/s40634-021-00346-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning methods in sport injury prediction and prevention: a systematic review

Abstract: Purpose Injuries are common in sports and can have significant physical, psychological and financial consequences. Machine learning (ML) methods could be used to improve injury prediction and allow proper approaches to injury prevention. The aim of our study was therefore to perform a systematic review of ML methods in sport injury prediction and prevention. Methods A search of the PubMed database was performed on March 24th 2020. Eligible articles… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
110
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
110
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Supervised machine learning models can learn a function that map an input (e.g., external workloads, internal workloads, and self-reported wellness) to an output (e.g., injury label). Van Eetvelde et al [ 74 ], in their review about injury forecasting by machine learning model, asserted that the results detected in the previous papers are promising in the sense that these models might help coaches, physical trainers, and medical practitioners in the decision-making process for injury prevention and prediction. The most common supervised machine learning models used for injury forecasting are decision trees [ 15 , 20 , 23 , 24 ], binary logistic regression [ 6 , 11 , 15 , 24 ], random forests [ 15 , 22 , 24 ], and supporting vector machines [ 22 , 24 ].…”
Section: Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supervised machine learning models can learn a function that map an input (e.g., external workloads, internal workloads, and self-reported wellness) to an output (e.g., injury label). Van Eetvelde et al [ 74 ], in their review about injury forecasting by machine learning model, asserted that the results detected in the previous papers are promising in the sense that these models might help coaches, physical trainers, and medical practitioners in the decision-making process for injury prevention and prediction. The most common supervised machine learning models used for injury forecasting are decision trees [ 15 , 20 , 23 , 24 ], binary logistic regression [ 6 , 11 , 15 , 24 ], random forests [ 15 , 22 , 24 ], and supporting vector machines [ 22 , 24 ].…”
Section: Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24,25 Again, given the complexity of the training process, advanced statistics and machine learning techniques such as regression and decision trees can be recommended for this purpose. 21,22,[25][26][27][28] To evaluate predictive accuracy, appropriate statistical measures such as sensitivity, specificity, and mean absolute error should be used. 14,22 Also, it is advised to distinguish the model's in-sample and out-of-sample performance when interpreting predictive accuracy.…”
Section: Predictive Analyticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17][18][19][20]26 In addition, the amount of training process data that are collected in elite sports is relatively small compared with other "big data" domains, such as finance using the historical data of stock prices or social sciences using social media data. Therefore, we advise being careful in dealing with commercial assertions that claim accurate training process data predictions (for more examples on predictive analytics in elite sports, see Van Eetvelde et al 27 and Richter et al 26 ).…”
Section: Predictive Analyticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, there has been an increased focus on the use of artificial intelligence and machine learning to improve predictive capability within several fields of medicine, including orthopaedic surgery [5][6][7][8][9]. These advanced statistical techniques utilize computer algorithms to model complex interactions between variables and may lead to improved capacity to predict outcome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%