2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2020.103810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning of dual porosity model closures from discrete fracture simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One method of incorporating this information is to use flow simulation on small-scale or idealised DFNs to derive an empirical relationship between these various geometric parameters and the fracture permeability tensor (e.g. Andrianov 2021, Andrianov & Nick 2021.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One method of incorporating this information is to use flow simulation on small-scale or idealised DFNs to derive an empirical relationship between these various geometric parameters and the fracture permeability tensor (e.g. Andrianov 2021, Andrianov & Nick 2021.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, there are various investigations performed in the literature based on a bridge between the dual-porosity approach and other techniques to enhance the accuracy of the dual-porosity results. [54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63] However, in most of the aforementioned studies, the applied shape factor is assumed to be constant in both unsteady and steady-state situations and only depends on the geometry of blocks. Accordingly, these assumptions lead to significant errors in the simulations, especially in the transient stages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A summary of the dimensionless shape factors obtained from the previous studies is presented in Table 1. Furthermore, there are various investigations performed in the literature based on a bridge between the dual‐porosity approach and other techniques to enhance the accuracy of the dual‐porosity results 54–63 . However, in most of the aforementioned studies, the applied shape factor is assumed to be constant in both unsteady and steady‐state situations and only depends on the geometry of blocks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study conducted the missing feature and proposed the proper characteristics in combination with in-situ fluid saturations. Andrianov and Nick (2000) [35] employed ML-based analytical method along with the discrete fracture simulations to generate a dual porosity model. Accordingly, a pixelated representation technique was employed to characterize the fracture geometry.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%