2023
DOI: 10.1002/ep.14131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning predictive models for optimal design of photovoltaic/thermal collector with nanofluids based geothermal cooling

Abstract: This study aims to estimate the performance of photovoltaic/thermal (PV/T) collector using alumina water‐based nanofluid with geothermal cooling through machine learning (ML) approach. A mathematical model is developed for the first law of thermodynamic analysis of nanofluid in PV/T system integrated with geothermal cooling and is validated with experimental results. Further, a machine learning‐based approach has been employed to simulate the cooling performance of a nanofluid cooling based PV/T system. In the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 46 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They presented a highly accurate predictive model with R 2 ranges of 0.9997-0.9999 for the dataset used in their study. Recently, Jakhar et al developed a multi-layer perceptron (MLP) in order to match other researchers' targets in predicting the performance of a thermal/photovoltaic system with nanofluids-based geothermal cooling [20]. The average rate of determination (R 2 ) of their predictive model reached 98%, and the improved predicted cell temperature and electrical performance were 32.1 • C and 10.66%, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They presented a highly accurate predictive model with R 2 ranges of 0.9997-0.9999 for the dataset used in their study. Recently, Jakhar et al developed a multi-layer perceptron (MLP) in order to match other researchers' targets in predicting the performance of a thermal/photovoltaic system with nanofluids-based geothermal cooling [20]. The average rate of determination (R 2 ) of their predictive model reached 98%, and the improved predicted cell temperature and electrical performance were 32.1 • C and 10.66%, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%