2021
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning technique for morphological classification of galaxies from the SDSS

Abstract: Context. Machine learning methods are effective tools in astronomical tasks for classifying objects by their individual features. One of the promising utilities is related to the morphological classification of galaxies at different redshifts. Aims. We use the photometry-based approach for the SDSS data 1) to exploit five supervised machine learning techniques and define the most effective among them for the automated galaxy morphological classification; 2) to test the influence of photometry data on morpholog… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
1
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is clear that the strategy used in this work needs further development to properly assess significantly larger cluster samples or to eventually conduct a blind search for cluster emission. In this respect, machine-based techniques represent an appealing solution to classify the emission in large object samples (e.g., Aniyan & Thorat 2017;Alhassan et al 2018;Domínguez Sánchez et al 2018;Lukic et al 2018Lukic et al , 2019Sadeghi et al 2021;Vavilova et al 2021). As part of this work, we have made public all our images and the detailed results of our decision-tree-based classification, which we hope can provide a good training set for algorithms that attempt either the full classification or to aid the automation at specific intersections in a decision-tree-type approach.…”
Section: Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear that the strategy used in this work needs further development to properly assess significantly larger cluster samples or to eventually conduct a blind search for cluster emission. In this respect, machine-based techniques represent an appealing solution to classify the emission in large object samples (e.g., Aniyan & Thorat 2017;Alhassan et al 2018;Domínguez Sánchez et al 2018;Lukic et al 2018Lukic et al , 2019Sadeghi et al 2021;Vavilova et al 2021). As part of this work, we have made public all our images and the detailed results of our decision-tree-based classification, which we hope can provide a good training set for algorithms that attempt either the full classification or to aid the automation at specific intersections in a decision-tree-type approach.…”
Section: Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Techniques based on machine learning may be promising but even then it is apparent that robust classifications are a formidable challenge (see, e.g. Aniyan & Thorat 2017;Lukic et al 2019;Vavilova et al 2021).…”
Section: Source Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years in fact, machine learning techniques have seen an increasingly significant impact on astronomical studies, in response to the undergoing rapid growth in size and complexity of datasets as provided by current large surveys like SDSS, MANGA or GAIA (Gaia Collaboration et al 2016), and in preparation for future ones like DESI (Levi et al 2013), SKA (Dewdney et al 2009) and LSST (Ivezic et al 2008). Such algorithms are successfully implemented to solve a variety of different problems, including the classification of galaxy morphological types (e.g., de la Calleja & Fuentes 2004; Barchi et al 2020;Vavilova et al 2021;Reza 2021), the identification of transients (Sooknunan et al 2021), or the multi-parametric analysis of very large databases of galaxy properties (e.g., Teimoorinia et al 2016Teimoorinia et al , 2021Ho 2019;Bluck et al 2019Bluck et al , 2020. Inspired especially by the latter works, in this paper we train and test artificial neural networks (ANN) and random forest decision trees (RF) to assess the performance of a set of carefully selected parameters (both individually and as a whole) and identify which properties are the most relevant in predicting the observed deviation of star-forming galaxies from their average sequence in both the [N ]-and [S ]-BPT diagrams.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%