2016
DOI: 10.1109/jlt.2015.2508502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine Learning Techniques in Optical Communication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
55
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Accurately predicting the signal and noise power evolution of a long chain of un-flattened optical amplifiers for arbitrary transmit (TX) power profiles is difficult, as a small change in the TX power spectral density (PSD) or in the spectral link characteristics may cause a complicated evolution of signal and noise powers through the system, making it intractable to computationally solve the problem using analytical or numerical physics-based optical amplifier models. We therefore resort to machine learning [4] and build a deep neural network (DNN) as a digital twin of our optical fiber link. Once properly trained with experimental link data, the DNN allows for an off-line gradient-descent (GD) optimization whose optimized results are then verified experimentally.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurately predicting the signal and noise power evolution of a long chain of un-flattened optical amplifiers for arbitrary transmit (TX) power profiles is difficult, as a small change in the TX power spectral density (PSD) or in the spectral link characteristics may cause a complicated evolution of signal and noise powers through the system, making it intractable to computationally solve the problem using analytical or numerical physics-based optical amplifier models. We therefore resort to machine learning [4] and build a deep neural network (DNN) as a digital twin of our optical fiber link. Once properly trained with experimental link data, the DNN allows for an off-line gradient-descent (GD) optimization whose optimized results are then verified experimentally.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of ML to physical layer use cases is mainly motivated by the presence of non-linear effects in optical fibers, which make analytical models inaccurate or even too complex. This has implications, e.g., on the performance predictions of optical communication systems, in terms of BER, quality factor (Q-factor) and also for signal demodulation [30], [31], [32].…”
Section: Motivation For Using Machine Learning In Optical Networmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EM has been used in optical communications, such as signal detection [46], and signal nonlinear compensation [47], but to the best of our knowledge, it has not been used in optical networks yet.…”
Section: Activation Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%