Machine Learning Techniques to Explore Clinical Presentations of COVID-19 Severity and to Test the Association With Unhealthy Opioid Use: Retrospective Cross-sectional Cohort Study

Abstract

Background The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated health inequities in the United States. People with unhealthy opioid use (UOU) may face disproportionate challenges with COVID-19 precautions, and the pandemic has disrupted access to opioids and UOU treatments. UOU impairs the immunological, cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal, and neurological systems and may increase severity of outcomes for COVID-19. Objective We applied machine learning techniques to explore clinical presentations of hospitalized patients with UOU and COVID-19 and to test the association between UOU and COVID-19 disease severity. Methods This retrospective, cross-sectional cohort study was conducted based on data from 4110 electronic health record patient encounters at an academic health center in Chicago between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2020. The inclusion criterion was an unplanned admission of a patient aged ≥18 years; encounters were counted as COVID-19-positive if there was a positive test for COVID-19 or 2 COVID-19 International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision codes. Using a predefined cutoff with optimal sensitivity and specificity to identify UOU, we ran a machine learning UOU classifier on the data for patients with COVID-19 to estimate the subcohort of patients with UOU. Topic modeling was used to explore and compare the clinical presentations documented for 2 subgroups: encounters with UOU and COVID-19 and those with no UOU and COVID-19. Mixed effects logistic regression accounted for multiple encounters for some patients and tested the association between UOU and COVID-19 outcome severity. Severity was measured with 3 utilization metrics: low-severity unplanned admission, medium-severity unplanned admission and receiving mechanical ventilation, and high-severity unplanned admission with in-hospital death. All models controlled for age, sex, race/ethnicity, insurance status, and BMI. Results Topic modeling yielded 10 topics per subgroup and highlighted unique comorbidities associated with UOU and COVID-19 (eg, HIV) and no UOU and COVID-19 (eg, diabetes). In the regression analysis, each incremental increase in the classifier’s predicted probability of UOU was associated with 1.16 higher odds of COVID-19 outcome severity (odds ratio 1.16, 95% CI 1.04-1.29; P=.009). Conclusions Among patients hospitalized with COVID-19, UOU is an independent risk factor associated with greater outcome severity, including in-hospital death. Social determinants of health and opioid-related overdose are unique comorbidities in the clinical presentation of the UOU patient subgroup. Additional research is needed on the role of COVID-19 therapeutics and inpatient management of acute COVID-19 pneumonia for patients with UOU. Further research is needed to test associations between expanded evidence-based harm reduction strategies for UOU and vaccination rates, hospitalizations, and risks for overdose and death among people with UOU and COVID-19. Machine learning techniques may offer more exhaustive means for cohort discovery and a novel mixed methods approach to population health.

Realizing the Potential of Social Determinants Data: A Scoping Review of Approaches for Screening, Linkage, Extraction, Analysis and Interventions

“…Beyond clinical indicators, several studies incorporated validated SDoH indexes like the Area Deprivation Index [206,207], Social Deprivation Index [208] and CDC's Social Vulnerability Index [209]. In terms of analysis approaches, common methods included multivariate regression models like logistic regression (n = 13) [159,179,180,192,199,[210][211][212][213][214][215][216][217] and Cox proportional hazards models (n = 3) [138,196,212] to assess adjusted outcome associations with SDoH factors. Other advanced techniques leveraged included machine learning algorithms [215], geospatial analysis for clustering [218], and phenome-wide association studies [150] in select studies.…”

“…Deprivation Index [208] and CDC's Social Vulnerability Index [209]. In terms of analysis approaches, common methods included multivariate regression models like logistic regression (n = 13) [159,179,180,192,199,[210][211][212][213][214][215][216][217] and Cox proportional hazards models (n = 3) [138,196,212] to assess adjusted outcome associations with SDoH factors. Other advanced techniques leveraged included machine learning algorithms [215], geospatial analysis for clustering [218], and phenome-wide association studies [150] in select studies.…”