2021
DOI: 10.1177/01454455211038208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine Learning to Support Visual Inspection of Data: A Clinical Application

Abstract: Practitioners in pediatric feeding programs often rely on single-case experimental designs and visual inspection to make treatment decisions (e.g., whether to change or keep a treatment in place). However, researchers have shown that this practice remains subjective, and there is no consensus yet on the best approach to support visual inspection results. To address this issue, we present the first application of a pediatric feeding treatment evaluation using machine learning to analyze treatment effects. A 5-y… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For visual inspection of each phase comparison ( N = 198), raters responded “yes” or “no” to the following question: “Would the change observed from one phase to the next be indicative of functional control of the behaviour in the planned direction (i.e., increase or decrease) if it were reversed and replicated?” Raters also provided a continuous value from 0 (certainty of no effect in the planned direction) to 10 (certainty of an effect in the planned direction), with 0 to 4 corresponding to “No” and 5 to 10 corresponding to “Yes” (Taylor & Lanovaz, 2021). Five doctoral‐level behavior analysts with PhDs in psychology (one professor, four practitioners) made ratings based on the blinded AB graphs (see ExpertA.xlsx, ExpertB.xlsx, ExpertC.xlsx, ExpertD.xlsx, and ExpertE.xlsx for complete analyses).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For visual inspection of each phase comparison ( N = 198), raters responded “yes” or “no” to the following question: “Would the change observed from one phase to the next be indicative of functional control of the behaviour in the planned direction (i.e., increase or decrease) if it were reversed and replicated?” Raters also provided a continuous value from 0 (certainty of no effect in the planned direction) to 10 (certainty of an effect in the planned direction), with 0 to 4 corresponding to “No” and 5 to 10 corresponding to “Yes” (Taylor & Lanovaz, 2021). Five doctoral‐level behavior analysts with PhDs in psychology (one professor, four practitioners) made ratings based on the blinded AB graphs (see ExpertA.xlsx, ExpertB.xlsx, ExpertC.xlsx, ExpertD.xlsx, and ExpertE.xlsx for complete analyses).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the lexicon-based approach will be more practical, adequate, and insight generating for most behavior analysts than the learning-based approach. We therefore focus exclusively on lexicon-based approaches in this discussion, referring interested readers to more comprehensive works for an introduction to machine learning-based strategies (e.g., Liu, 2020) and their recent application to behavior analysis (Bailey et al, 2021;Lanovaz et al, 2020;Lanovaz & Hranchuk, 2021;Taylor & Lanovaz, 2021;Turgeon & Lanovaz, 2020).…”
Section: Sentiment Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%