2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-33-6424-0_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine Vision-Based Fruit and Vegetable Disease Recognition: A Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bhargava and Bansal (2021) examined techniques in computer vision for grading and classifying fruits and vegetables according to appearance, highlighting the need for improved performance and suggesting exploring color spaces and different image directions. Using computer vision and machine learning, Habib et al (2021) described recent advancements in fruit and vegetable disease detection, compared performance measures to pinpoint cutting-edge methods, and recommended future lines of inquiry. Koç and Vatandaş (2021) developed an image processing algorithm for classifying fruits based on size and color characteristics, with training success rates of 93.6% for KNN, 90.3% for DT, 88.3% for Naive Bayes, 92.6% for MLP, and 94.3% for RF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bhargava and Bansal (2021) examined techniques in computer vision for grading and classifying fruits and vegetables according to appearance, highlighting the need for improved performance and suggesting exploring color spaces and different image directions. Using computer vision and machine learning, Habib et al (2021) described recent advancements in fruit and vegetable disease detection, compared performance measures to pinpoint cutting-edge methods, and recommended future lines of inquiry. Koç and Vatandaş (2021) developed an image processing algorithm for classifying fruits based on size and color characteristics, with training success rates of 93.6% for KNN, 90.3% for DT, 88.3% for Naive Bayes, 92.6% for MLP, and 94.3% for RF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%