2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10739-020-09610-9
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macleay’s Choice: Transacting the Natural History Trade in the Nineteenth Century

Abstract: Much of our knowledge about the nineteenth-century natural history boom resides with the collectors themselves and their collections. We know much less about the conduct of the global trade that made collecting possible. That such a trade occurred in the face of significant obstacles of distance, variable prices, inadequate information, and diverse agents makes our knowledge deficit the more significant. William John Macleay, based in Sydney, built his significant natural history collection by trading locally … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1841, 3. 18 Ville, Wright, andPhilp 2020. 1. Underground Evolution -Setting the Stage heroically churned out on hand presses by sharp compositors.…”
Section: New Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1841, 3. 18 Ville, Wright, andPhilp 2020. 1. Underground Evolution -Setting the Stage heroically churned out on hand presses by sharp compositors.…”
Section: New Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, historical reconstructions and analyses of the global trade in natural history specimens during the 19th century are enriching understandings of museum collections (e.g., Ville et al., 2020). These studies recognise a vital need to broaden history of science to include consideration of the environmental conditions in which newly introduced organisms lived, whether in the laboratory, the garden, the field, the atmosphere or the body.…”
Section: Broadening Histories Of Knowledge Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, we argue that it is impossible to examine aspects of hybridization or genetics in a botanical garden, without considering either the networks of trade, commerce and culture which encouraged such experimentation or the potential ecological impacts of hybridized plants as weeds in a new environment (e.g., King, 2020;Minard, 2019). More recently, historical reconstructions and analyses of the global trade in natural history specimens during the 19th century are enriching understandings of museum collections (e.g., Ville et al, 2020). These studies recognise a vital need to broaden history of science to include consideration of the environmental conditions in which newly introduced organisms lived, whether in the laboratory, the garden, the field, the atmosphere or the body.…”
Section: Theoretical Engagementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 This work has subsequently been advanced by scholars investigating how different agents, such as field collectors, public institutions, commercial businesses and private collectors, made choices about the various pathways specimens might circulate within the natural history trade. 14 Despite these advances, a serious and ongoing gap in current scholarship involves the relationships that Indigenous people and societies had to networks of imperial science, as well as Indigenous responses to natural history projects. 15 Critical Indigenous Studies approaches to eighteenth-and nineteenth-century scientific networks have, to date, mainly focused on geologic and geographic scientific expeditions and their ethnographic undercurrents.…”
Section: Archival Bias and Indigenous Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%