2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.02.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MACOP-B and Involved-Field Radiotherapy Is an Effective and Safe Therapy for Primary Mediastinal Large B Cell Lymphoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…42 The age-adjusted IPI has generally been reported to be of limited predictive value, [43][44][45] although in a recent series of 92 patients there was some clear discriminative value. 46 Elevation of LDH to greater than twice the upper limit of normal, age over 40 and performance status ≥ 2 all correlated with reduced survival in a population-based series from British Columbia, 43 while in a large series from the International Extranodal Lymphoma Study Group (IELSG) male sex, poor performance status and advancedstage disease were significant negative predictors of survival. 47 …”
Section: Prognostic Factorsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…42 The age-adjusted IPI has generally been reported to be of limited predictive value, [43][44][45] although in a recent series of 92 patients there was some clear discriminative value. 46 Elevation of LDH to greater than twice the upper limit of normal, age over 40 and performance status ≥ 2 all correlated with reduced survival in a population-based series from British Columbia, 43 while in a large series from the International Extranodal Lymphoma Study Group (IELSG) male sex, poor performance status and advancedstage disease were significant negative predictors of survival. 47 …”
Section: Prognostic Factorsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…349 In retrospective analyses, intensive chemotherapy regimens have been more effective than CHOP, [350][351][352] and the addition of IFRT improved outcomes. 353,354 The role of RT must be confirmed in randomized trials. In a retrospective study, the addition of rituximab to MACOP-B (methotrexate, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone, and bleomycin) or VACOP-B (etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone, and bleomycin) did not seem to result in significant differences in clinical outcomes.…”
Section: Pmblmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 5-year OS and PFS rates were 87 and 81%, respectively. This study showed that MACOP-B and IFRT induced high response and lymphoma-free survival rates (10). In the present study, RT was associated with significantly improved PFS and OS rates compared with patients without RT, and furthermore, the analysis performed on patients who achieved more than PD following chemotherapy showed that RT was associated with a significantly improved 5-year OS rate and exhibited a trend for an improved 5-year PFS rate, which is similar to the results of the aforementioned studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (CHOP) regimen is considered to be inferior to other more intensive regimens (6)(7)(8)(9)(10), such as the methotrexate, cytarabine, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone and bleomycin regimen (MACOP-B), dose-dense regimens, or even front-line consolidation high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation. However, none of these intensified approaches is now expected to provide results superior to those observed with rituximab plus CHOP (RCHOP).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%