2002
DOI: 10.3354/meps244063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macroalgal photosynthetic responses to light in relation to thallus morphology and depth zonation

Abstract: We show how photosynthesis and UV sensitivity of algae are related to thallus morphology and depth distributions. This was studied for typical depth zonations of red and brown macroalgae in the Skagerrak (ca. 25 psu) and the Baltic Sea (6.5 psu). The algae were collected from the water surface down to 20.5 m of depth, whereby each species was sampled at its maximum abundance depth. Altogether, we measured photosynthetic and respiratory rates of 19 red and 13 brown algal species as O 2 evolution at different li… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
64
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
5
64
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thallus morphology is related to the photophysiological responses of species living in the intertidal zone (Markager & Sand-Jensen, 1996;Taylor et al, 1998;Johansson & Snoeijs, 2002;Runcie et al, 2003). In our study, the larger surface area of C. caespitosa might be advantageous at low light in terms of increased light absorption per unit biomass.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thallus morphology is related to the photophysiological responses of species living in the intertidal zone (Markager & Sand-Jensen, 1996;Taylor et al, 1998;Johansson & Snoeijs, 2002;Runcie et al, 2003). In our study, the larger surface area of C. caespitosa might be advantageous at low light in terms of increased light absorption per unit biomass.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…These parameters usually follow the distribution of macroalgae at different tidal levels, which occur at scales from microscale (Williams & Carpenter, 1990;Beach & Smith, 1996) to hundreds of metres (Lüning, 1981;Chapman & Johnson, 1990). Differences in photokinetic parameters have been identified between species (Lüning, 1981;Mathieson & Dawes, 1986;Henley & Ramus, 1989b;Johansson & Snoeijs, 2002) and within species (Coutinho & Yoneshigue, 1988;Silva et al, 1998;Ekelund et al, 2007). The light compensation point for growth (E c ) represents the minimum light requirements and sets the lowest depth limits for subtidal macroalgae (Mathieson & Norall, 1975).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Macroalgae growing in shallower depth are often more tolerant to UV and recover well after periods of high UV radiation. Morphologically, species with tougher and thicker thalli may also be less sensitive to UVR as a result of more protective tissue (Johansson and Snoeijs 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding depth (Raniello et al, 2006), changes in pigment composition were thought to represent algal photoacclimation responses in order to optimize light capture (increase in α) and photosynthetic performance (decrease in E k ) as light becomes limiting. These are common responses seen in some macroalgae species able to develop over broad depth gradients (Ramus et al, 1977;Markager and Sand-Jensen, 1992;Gómez et al, 1997;Johansson and Snoeijs, 2002). Nonetheless, the extent to which the ability of Mediterranean populations of C. racemosa to photoacclimate effectively is responsible for productivity and potential colonization success remains unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%