2017
DOI: 10.1111/cbdd.12922
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macrocycles, the edge of drug‐likeness chemical space or Goldilocks zone?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, this variation in ring sizes between known inhibitors made us wonder whether the current ring size is already optimal for each macrocycle. 27,28 However, no such SAR explorations have been reported. To address how ring size may affect the biological activity of ipomoeassin F, one of the most potent Sec61 inhibitors identified to date, we designed two new analogues (1 and 2, Figure 1) with an 18-membered and 22-membered ring, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, this variation in ring sizes between known inhibitors made us wonder whether the current ring size is already optimal for each macrocycle. 27,28 However, no such SAR explorations have been reported. To address how ring size may affect the biological activity of ipomoeassin F, one of the most potent Sec61 inhibitors identified to date, we designed two new analogues (1 and 2, Figure 1) with an 18-membered and 22-membered ring, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, excluding the synthetic compound eeyarestatin I, all the other Sec61α inhibitors belong to one of the distinct classes of macrocyclic natural products with different ring sizes: cotransins (21-membered), , apratoxins (25-membered), , mycolactone (12-membered), decatransin (30-membered), coibamide A (22-membered), , and ipomoeassins (20-membered). , Thus, it appears that a macrocyclic ring is a preferred structural feature among Sec61α-targeting inhibitors. Furthermore, this variation in ring sizes between known inhibitors made us wonder whether the current ring size is already optimal for each macrocycle. , However, no such SAR explorations have been reported. To address how ring size may affect the biological activity of ipomoeassin F, one of the most potent Sec61 inhibitors identified to date, we designed two new analogues ( 1 and 2 , Figure ) with an 18-membered and 22-membered ring, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inspection of available data suggests that most compounds appear to abide within the limit of HBD < 5 as illustrated in Figure 4. Despite this evidence, there has been a recent upsurge in the number of drugs approved for therapeutic use that tend to violate HBD and pertinent Ro5 criteria [69][70][71][72]. In view of these developments, suggestions to expand such limits have been considered and a modified version designated as beyond Ro5 (bRo5) proposed [69].…”
Section: Criteria For Selecting Prospective Lead Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Macrocycles are scaffolds with a ring containing at least 12 atoms (Mallinson and Collins, 2012). Macrocycles also contain many desirable properties such as, less rigidity and flexibility, high binding capabilities, having affinity to anions and cations, high bio-availability, and the ability to target protein-protein interactions (PPI) (Choi and Hamilton, 2003;Dougherty et al, 2017;Ermert, 2017;Selwood, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%