2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macroeconomic effect of energy transition to carbon neutrality: Evidence from China's coal capacity cut policy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), the CO 2 emissions from coal account for 44% and 79.5% of total emission, globally and in China, respectively. Some countries have been intended to phase down coal utilization as their concrete plans, as widely discussed in [ 15 19 ]; however, it is not a practically feasible option in China from near-term perspective: among the total coal consumption in China, nearly 51% of coal is used in coal-fired plants, generating over 70% of annual electricity, which is impossible to be suddenly substituted with the intermittent and random renewable power from energy security consideration [ 12 , 20 , 21 ]; the other 49% of coal is consumed mostly for heating or used as resources in industrial sectors, which could only be changed if there are economically feasible non-fossil substances that can be widely used as alternatives (but it seems impossible at present) [ 20 , 22 ]. Even that carbon capture and storage (CCS) techniques seem to be a promising way to remove those fossil carbon mitigation, they are seldom deployed in an expected scale due to the lower-than-desired efficiency [ 23 ], as well as causing obvious energy efficiency loss and extra expenses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), the CO 2 emissions from coal account for 44% and 79.5% of total emission, globally and in China, respectively. Some countries have been intended to phase down coal utilization as their concrete plans, as widely discussed in [ 15 19 ]; however, it is not a practically feasible option in China from near-term perspective: among the total coal consumption in China, nearly 51% of coal is used in coal-fired plants, generating over 70% of annual electricity, which is impossible to be suddenly substituted with the intermittent and random renewable power from energy security consideration [ 12 , 20 , 21 ]; the other 49% of coal is consumed mostly for heating or used as resources in industrial sectors, which could only be changed if there are economically feasible non-fossil substances that can be widely used as alternatives (but it seems impossible at present) [ 20 , 22 ]. Even that carbon capture and storage (CCS) techniques seem to be a promising way to remove those fossil carbon mitigation, they are seldom deployed in an expected scale due to the lower-than-desired efficiency [ 23 ], as well as causing obvious energy efficiency loss and extra expenses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The issue of carbon neutrality, an important concept in the study of climate change, has received considerable critical attention (Zanchi et al, 2012;Ji et al, 2014). It is a systematic process that requires the cooperation of multiple departments to achieve this goal (Yue et al, 2021;Zhang et al, 2021). Recent research has reported that setting emission reduction targets is substantially delineating the boundaries of natural capital (or carbon assets) (Zhou et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has also been a surge of interest in the effects of these numerous techniques (Bonan, 2008;Fuhrman et al, 2020). What's more, existing research recognizes the critical role played by the market that includes carbon tax (Soregaroli et al, 2021;Zhang et al, 2021) and carbon emissions trading scheme (Wang et al, 2019). Recent evidence suggests that there is a positive relationship between China's carbon emissions trading scheme (ETS) and companies' stock returns (Wen et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, several studies focused on assessing Frontiers in Environmental Science frontiersin.org transition policies from a coal industrial chain perspective (Liu et al, 2017;Zhao et al, 2021). More policy studies focused on individual stages of the coal industrial chain, such as from the coal production perspective or from the coal consumption perspective (Spencer et al, 2018;Zhang et al, 2021;Jia et al, 2022). However, although some studies considered carbon neutrality targets, a comprehensive and industrial chain stagespecific analysis is still lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%