2014
DOI: 10.2753/ree1540-496x500103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macroeconomic Impact of Bank Regulation and Supervision: A Cross-Country Investigation

Abstract: Bank regulation and supervision (RS) is a formal institutional mechanism that aims to reduce the adverse selection and moral hazard risks in the banking sector. This paper offers an empirical exploration of the relationship between banking-sector performance and RS using data on the legal quality of bank regulation and supervision. The main channels via which RS affects bank performance are considered to be depositor trust, investment mobilization, and borrower discipline. An event study of up to fifty-three c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies find that banking regulation improves bank performance and stability, including a decline in NPLs in many emerging economies (see, e.g. Fu, Lin, and Molyneux 2014; Klomp and de Haan 2014;Neyapti and Dincer 2014;Ozkan, Balsari, and Varan 2014). Higher levels of bank regulation may decrease bank competition, thereby improving the stability of the banking system, which supports the evidence reported by Cao and Shi (2001) and Riordan (1993).…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesis Developmentsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Recent studies find that banking regulation improves bank performance and stability, including a decline in NPLs in many emerging economies (see, e.g. Fu, Lin, and Molyneux 2014; Klomp and de Haan 2014;Neyapti and Dincer 2014;Ozkan, Balsari, and Varan 2014). Higher levels of bank regulation may decrease bank competition, thereby improving the stability of the banking system, which supports the evidence reported by Cao and Shi (2001) and Riordan (1993).…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesis Developmentsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Paradoxically, higher capital ratios are associated with reduced risk, as these banks have less incentive to engage in speculative activities. Neyapti and Nergiz Dincer (2014) further support this, emphasizing the role of legal quality in reducing non-performing loans and promoting efficient resource allocation. Additionally, the impact of bank capital on profitability and risk is contingent on financial regulations.…”
Section: The Impact Of Capital Requirements On Banking Performancementioning
confidence: 70%
“…Partially contrary to this, Căpraru and Ihnatov (2014) analyze the main determinants of bank profitability in Central Eastern European countries and find that higher capital adequacy (an element emphasized in the recent regulatory framework) results in higher bank profitability. Bouheni et al (2014), Neyapti andDincer (2014), andOzkan et al(2014) conclude the same, proving that supervision and regulation improve bank profitability. In contrast, Chortareas et al (2012) examine the dynamics between key supervisory and regulatory policies.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 73%