2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2013.01.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macrofouling of deep-sea instrumentation after three years at 3690m depth in the Charlie Gibbs fracture zone, mid-Atlantic ridge, with emphasis on hydroids (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Individuals of Bouillonia spp. have been previously observed on crustacean carapaces, the perisarc tubes of conspecifics, and as an abundant macrofouling organism on experimental installations in the mid‐Atlantic (Blanco et al, 2013; Svoboda et al, 2006). We consider it most likely that B. cornucopia has an extremely patchy distribution and settles opportunistically in biogenic or anthropogenic habitats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Individuals of Bouillonia spp. have been previously observed on crustacean carapaces, the perisarc tubes of conspecifics, and as an abundant macrofouling organism on experimental installations in the mid‐Atlantic (Blanco et al, 2013; Svoboda et al, 2006). We consider it most likely that B. cornucopia has an extremely patchy distribution and settles opportunistically in biogenic or anthropogenic habitats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…by Svoboda et al (2006), were found in collections from the Norwegian Sea (69°04.8'-69°05.3'N, 04°41.6'-04°43.7'E, 3213 m and 69°21.9'-69°20.6'N, 10°25.2'-10°28'E, 2966 m), the Laptev Sea (78°16.22'N, 130°02.8'E, 2470 m), and possibly from the Mid-Atlantic Ridge off the Gulf of Guinea. Meanwhile, other unidentified species of Bouillonia have been reported from a deep-sea lander at 3690 m in the Charlie Gibbs fracture zone of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge (Blanco et al 2013), and from photographs of benthic substrates in the Eurasian Central Arctic (Rybakova et al 2019).…”
Section: Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EOM design seeks to provide self-monitoring capabilities for two reasons: 1) measurement bias and 2) degree of impact by the structures' presence and functioning on the local environment (typical sizes of the main components of observatory systems are likely to be around 3-5 m on each side and 2-4 m in height). Since any observatory will function as an artificial reef and thereby modify the local habitat characteristics that are being measured (Vardaro et al 2007, Blanco et al 2013), more attention is needed to understand the attraction, repulsion, and residency effects of the structures and their operations (e.g. pan-tilt camera motor noise, mobile platform noise, and illumination at imaging) on sessile and motile species and their interactions with each other (e.g.…”
Section: Background: Ecosystem Connectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%