2017
DOI: 10.18779/cyt.v10i1.196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macroinvertebrados acuáticos como indicadores de calidad hídrica en áreas de descargas residuales al río Quevedo, Ecuador

Abstract: El trabajo tuvo como objetivos caracterizar las condiciones físico-químicas del agua, identificar la diversidad de macroinvertebrados bentónicos y determinar la calidad hídrica en dos sitios urbanos de monitoreo del río en la ciudad de Quevedo. Los muestreos se realizaron desde septiembre a noviembre del 2015, en sitios influenciados por descargas de efluentes residenciales (ER) y agrícolas-industriales (EAI). Se midieron los parámetros físico-químicos de calidad del agua: oxígeno disuelto, demanda bio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Shannon index shows a low value, less than 2, which implies a low biodiversity of macroinvertebrates [35] especially in upstream area, situation that can be explained because generally the headwaters and first sections of the basins have less diversity than the middle of the main river channel [33]. Despite this common low diversity between upstream and downstream areas, the data collected in spring at downstream area showed a significant differences between the other points analyzed, this situation could be explain by the nearness to urbanized territories, influence of residual discharges, less coverage and higher environment impact [36], [32], [37].The richness and diversity show a similar relationship to that of the Shannon index, showing low values, slightly differentiated with greater diversity in downstream area, with a spring effect that increases the difference. Regarding the Pielou index, it shows similar trends to the Shannon index without significant variation as in other studies [38], [39], [40].…”
Section: Macroinvertebrate Communitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Shannon index shows a low value, less than 2, which implies a low biodiversity of macroinvertebrates [35] especially in upstream area, situation that can be explained because generally the headwaters and first sections of the basins have less diversity than the middle of the main river channel [33]. Despite this common low diversity between upstream and downstream areas, the data collected in spring at downstream area showed a significant differences between the other points analyzed, this situation could be explain by the nearness to urbanized territories, influence of residual discharges, less coverage and higher environment impact [36], [32], [37].The richness and diversity show a similar relationship to that of the Shannon index, showing low values, slightly differentiated with greater diversity in downstream area, with a spring effect that increases the difference. Regarding the Pielou index, it shows similar trends to the Shannon index without significant variation as in other studies [38], [39], [40].…”
Section: Macroinvertebrate Communitymentioning
confidence: 99%